Imported Upstream version 2.12.3

[lilypond.git] / Documentation / bibliography / computer-notation.bib

diff --git a/Documentation/bibliography/computer-notation.bib b/Documentation/bibliography/computer-notation.bib
index 23d915aecca4a8cb3208ee7feb44b64393b776f8..b5887cbd2939a20103f582c9eae3d122e4ce33ca 100644 (file)
--- a/Documentation/bibliography/computer-notation.bib
+++ b/Documentation/bibliography/computer-notation.bib
@@ -96,8 +96,7 @@ for music composition}
   author = {Donald Byrd},
   school = {Indiana University},
 
-note = {Describes the SMUT (sic) system for automated music printout.}
-
+  note = {Describes the SMUT (sic) system for automated music printout.}
 }
 
 @InProceedings{assayaag86,
@@ -198,7 +197,7 @@ representation is rather vague. HWN}
   year =        1993,
   volume =      17,
   number =      3,
-  url = {http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/52890.html},
+  url = {http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.44.6067},
 
   note = {This article  points to some problems and solutions with music
 representation. HWN},
@@ -286,7 +285,6 @@ pages = {451--454},
 
 
 @Article {haken93,
-  note = {A description of Lime internals (which resemble older (before 0.0.68pre) LilyPond data structures) HWN},
   year =  {1993},
   title = {The Tilia Music Representation: Extensibility, Abstraction, and Notation Contexts for the Lime Music Editor},
   author = {Lippold Haken and Dorothea Blostein},
@@ -599,7 +597,7 @@ note = {This dutch thesis describes a monophonic typesetting system,
   journal= {Electronic Publishing},
   volume={6},
   number={4}, pages = {507--518},
-  url={http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/512957.html},
+  url={http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.17.1480},
 }
 
 
@@ -657,10 +655,6 @@ users in mind) (sic) HWN},
   year={1996}
 }
 
-
-
-
-
 @Article {tablature-web,
   note = {FAQ (with answers) about TAB, the ASCII variant of Tablature. HWN},
   title = {how to read and write tab: a guide to tab notation},
@@ -683,16 +677,14 @@ users in mind) (sic) HWN},
 }
 
 @Article {smdl-web,
-  author={unknown},
-  title = {SMDL, Standard Musical Description Language},
+  author = {International Organization for Standardization (ISO)},
+  title = {Information Technology - Document Description and Processing Languages - Standard Music Description Language (SMDL)},
   pdf= {ftp://ftp.ornl.gov/pub/sgml/wg8/smdl/10743.pdf},
-  note={ISO/IEC DIS 10743
-
-SGML instance for describing music.  Very comprehensive in music
+  number={ISO/IEC DIS 10743},
+  year = {1992},
+  annote = {SGML instance for describing music.  Very comprehensive in music
 definition, but no support for notation / performance whatsoever (They
 basically say: "You can embed a NIFF or MIDI file")}
-
-},
 }
 
 
@@ -701,7 +693,7 @@ basically say: "You can embed a NIFF or MIDI file")}
   note = {Describes a system called MusicEase, and explains that it
   uses "constraints" (which go unexplained) to automatically position
   various elements. },
-
+  html={http://mesastate.edu/~grader/ieeeme.pdf}, 
   year =  {1996},
   title = {Creating Printed Music Automatically},
   author = {Gary M. Rader},
@@ -724,7 +716,7 @@ basically say: "You can embed a NIFF or MIDI file")}
   author =      {Michael Droettboom},
   title =       {Study of music Notation Description Languages},
   year =        2000,
-  url= {http://gigue.peabody.jhu.edu/~mdboom/format.pdf},
+  url= {http://www.music.mcgill.ca/~ich/research/omr/levy/format.pdf},
 
   note ={GUIDO and lilypond compared. LilyPond wins on practical
 issues as usability and availability of tools, GUIDO wins on