Fix typos in the proposed new maintainer script wording

diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
index 9e8689ecdf8775f783607d08ff1be9a5731f2064..20c0c84139e7a86ef641f9b0baf2d3b673950c6a 100644 (file)
--- a/policy.sgml
+++ b/policy.sgml
@@ -3805,7 +3805,7 @@ Checksums-Sha256:
              unpacking the new package because the <tt>postrm
              upgrade</tt> action failed.  The unpacked files may be
              partly from the new version or partly missing, so the script
-             cannot not rely on files included in the package.  Package
+             cannot rely on files included in the package.  Package
              dependencies may not be available.  Pre-dependencies will be
              at least unpacked following the same rules as above, except
              they may be only "Half-Installed" if an upgrade of the
@@ -3931,7 +3931,7 @@ Checksums-Sha256:
            <tag><var>new-postrm</var> <tt>abort-upgrade</tt>
              <var>old-version</var></tag>
            <item>
-             Called before unpackaging the new package as part of the
+             Called before unpacking the new package as part of the
              error handling of <prgn>preinst</prgn> failures.  May assume
              the same state as <prgn>preinst</prgn> can assume.
            </item>
@@ -4789,7 +4789,7 @@ Build-Depends: foo [linux-any], bar [any-i386], baz [!linux-any]
        <p>
          When one binary package declares that it breaks another,
          <prgn>dpkg</prgn> will refuse to allow the package which
-         declares <tt>Breaks</tt> be unpacked unless the broken
+         declares <tt>Breaks</tt> to be unpacked unless the broken
          package is deconfigured first, and it will refuse to
          allow the broken package to be reconfigured.
        </p>