From: Jonathan Nieder Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 22:34:20 +0000 (-0700) Subject: Fix typos in the proposed new maintainer script wording X-Git-Url: https://git.donarmstrong.com/?p=debian%2Fdebian-policy.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=b09e5026a4ba69afb89ff9a7012d1ab2d2c6931b Fix typos in the proposed new maintainer script wording --- diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml index 9e8689e..20c0c84 100644 --- a/policy.sgml +++ b/policy.sgml @@ -3805,7 +3805,7 @@ Checksums-Sha256: unpacking the new package because the postrm upgrade action failed. The unpacked files may be partly from the new version or partly missing, so the script - cannot not rely on files included in the package. Package + cannot rely on files included in the package. Package dependencies may not be available. Pre-dependencies will be at least unpacked following the same rules as above, except they may be only "Half-Installed" if an upgrade of the @@ -3931,7 +3931,7 @@ Checksums-Sha256: new-postrm abort-upgrade old-version - Called before unpackaging the new package as part of the + Called before unpacking the new package as part of the error handling of preinst failures. May assume the same state as preinst can assume. @@ -4789,7 +4789,7 @@ Build-Depends: foo [linux-any], bar [any-i386], baz [!linux-any]

When one binary package declares that it breaks another, dpkg will refuse to allow the package which - declares Breaks be unpacked unless the broken + declares Breaks to be unpacked unless the broken package is deconfigured first, and it will refuse to allow the broken package to be reconfigured.