* mf/feta-params.mf (stafflines): fix stafflinethickness at 0.5 pt

[lilypond.git] / mf / feta-params.mf

diff --git a/mf/feta-params.mf b/mf/feta-params.mf
index fe1200789c53dee9d2e71fd91e0fccf61beeea0d..402951757923f0df018b4cc0992e5e47f0acf795 100644 (file)
--- a/mf/feta-params.mf
+++ b/mf/feta-params.mf
@@ -1,22 +1,21 @@
 
 stafflines = 5;
+% [reuter] URG!  This is not always true.  One of the effects of
+% keeping this a constant is that, for notation with less stafflines,
+% stafflinethickness gets too small.
 
-interline#:=staffsize#/(stafflines-1);
+staff_space#:=staffsize#/(stafflines-1);
 
-% URG!
-% font_x_height ( interline# );
 
-%
-%  [D.K.Roush & J.S.Gourlay] say this should be 0.072
-% We know better
-% generally, the "blackness" of most chars depends on this.
-%
-stafflinethickness#:=0.1 interline#;
 
-stemthickness# := stafflinethickness#;
+% measuring on pocket scores turns out: stafflinethickness is
+% independent on staff size, and generally 0.5 pt.
+stafflinethickness#  :=0.5 pt#; 
+
+stemthickness# := 1.3 stafflinethickness#;
 ledgerlinethickness# := 2 stafflinethickness#;
 
-define_pixels(interline, stemthickness);
+define_pixels(staff_space, stemthickness);
 define_pixels(stafflinethickness,ledgerlinethickness);
 
 %
@@ -35,8 +34,16 @@ overdone_heads = 0.0;
 %
 % this is not a meta variable: it is related to absolute sizes.
 %
-% According to [Wanske], only outside corners should be round
-%
+% FIXME: According to [Wanske], only outside corners should be round
+%        I don't think we do this anywhere -- jcn
 numeric blot_diameter;
-blot_diameter# = .4pt#;
+blot_diameter# = .35 pt#;
+if (blot_diameter# * hppp) < 1:
+       blot_diameter# := 1/hppp;
+fi
+if (blot_diameter# * vppp) < 1:
+       blot_diameter# := 1/vppp;
+fi
 define_pixels(blot_diameter);
+
+