Shouldn't scm_read () do this for us? */
scm_fill_input (port);
SCM to = scm_ftell (port);
- ps->nchars = gh_scm2int (to) - gh_scm2int (from);
+ ps->nchars = ly_scm2int (to) - ly_scm2int (from);
/* Don't close the port here; if we re-enter this function via a
continuation, then the next time we enter it, we'll get an error.
ps->start_location_.error (_("GUILE signaled an error for the expression beginning here"));
if (scm_ilength (args) > 2)
- scm_display_error_message (gh_cadr (args), gh_caddr (args), scm_current_error_port ());
+ scm_display_error_message (ly_cadr (args), ly_caddr (args), scm_current_error_port ());
/*
The following is a kludge; we should probably search for