-\version "1.5.68"
+\header { texidoc = "
+ lilypond should flip the tie's direction
+ to avoid a collision with the sharp.
+" }
-\header{
-texidoc="
-When tieing notes with accidentals across a bar boundary, the
-accidental must not be drawn on the note in the next bar. Unless the
-tie crosses a line break, in which case the accidental is repeated if
-it would be different from an untied note. The next note of the same
-pitch in this next bar should always show the accidental (even if it's
-natural). Slurring a accidentaled note to a natural one across bar
-boundaries should be explicit.
-Pitches can be verified by printing them with the @code{NoteNames} context.
-"
-}
+\version "2.14.0"
-thenotes = \notes \relative cis' {
- \time 4/4
- g'2 g ~ |
- g g4 gis |
- gis2 gis ~ |
- gis4 gis8 ~ gis g4 gis |
- g2 gis ~ |
- gis g4 gis |
- g2 gis( |
- )g! gis4 gis |
- \break
- \key a \major
- gis2 gis ~ |
- gis4 gis8 ~ gis g4 gis |
- gis2 g ~ |
- g4 gis8 ~ gis g4 gis |
- g2 gis ~ |
- gis g4 gis |
- g2 gis( |
-
- % FIXME: check for accidentals at line break could look more cute
- % maybe move to tie-break-accidental?
-
- % Btw: I don't even know what the rule is for the second note in the
- % next bar, if a reminder accidental was printed. These are really
- % not very common cases. Technically, if it is not tied, it
- % should get an accidental but it looks a bit silly and redundant.
- % See last g.
-
- )g! gis4 gis ~ | \break
- gis2 gis ~ | gis g ~\break
- g2 g
+\paper {
+ debug-tie-scoring = ##t
+ ragged-right = ##t
}
-\score {
- <
- \context Staff \thenotes
- \context NoteNames \thenotes
- >
+\relative c'' {
+ \override Tie #'layer = #2
+ a ~ <fis a>
}
+
+% EOF