-@c -*- coding: latin-1; mode: texinfo; -*-
+@c -*- coding: utf-8; mode: texinfo; -*-
+@c This file is part of lilypond.tely
+@ignore
+ Translation of GIT committish: FILL-IN-HEAD-COMMITTISH
+
+ When revising a translation, copy the HEAD committish of the
+ version that you are working on. See TRANSLATION for details.
+@end ignore
+
@node Putting it all together
@chapter Putting it all together
-This section explains how to use the rest of the documentation and
-how to solve common problems.
+This chapter discusses general LilyPond concepts and how to
+create @code{\score} blocks.
+
@menu
-* Suggestions for writing LilyPond files::
* Extending the templates::
-* Fixing overlapping notation::
+* How LilyPond files work::
+* Score is a single musical expression::
+* An orchestral part::
@end menu
-@node Suggestions for writing LilyPond files
-@section Suggestions for writing LilyPond files
-
-Now you're ready to begin writing larger LilyPond files -- not just the
-little examples in the tutorial, but whole pieces. But how should you
-go about doing it?
-
-The best answer is ``however you want to do it.'' As long as LilyPond
-can understand your files and produces the output that you want, it
-doesn't matter what your files look like. That said, sometimes we
-make mistakes when writing files. If LilyPond can't understand your
-files, or produces output that you don't like, how do you fix the
-problem?
-
-Here are a few suggestions that can help you to avoid or fix
-problems:
-
-@itemize @bullet
-@item Include @code{\version} numbers in every file. Note that all
-templates contain a @code{\version "2.6.0"} string. We
-highly recommend that you always include the @code{\version}, no matter
-how small your file is. Speaking from personal experience, it's
-quite frustrating to try to remember which version of LilyPond you were
-using a few years ago. @code{convert-ly} requires you to declare
-which version of LilyPond you used.
-
-@item Include checks: See @ref{Bar check} and @ref{Octave check}. If you
-include checks every so often, then if you make a mistake, you can pinpoint
-it quicker. How often is ``every so often''? It depends on the complexity
-of the music. For very simple music, perhaps just once or twice. For
-very complex music, every bar.
-
-@item One bar per line. If there is anything complicated, either in the music
-itself or in the output you desire, it's often good to write only one bar
-per line. Saving screen space by cramming eight bars per line just isn't
-worth it if you have to `debug' your files.
-
-@item Comment your files, with either bar numbers (every so often) or
-references to musical themes (``second theme in violins'', ``fourth
-variation''). You may not need it when you're writing the piece for
-the first time, but if you want to go back and change something two
-or three years later, you won't know how your file is structured if you
-don't comment the file.
-
-@end itemize
-
-
@node Extending the templates
@section Extending the templates
Start off with the template that seems closest to what you want to end
up with. Let's say that you want to write something for soprano and
-cello. In this case, we would start with ``Notes and lyrics'' (for the
+cello. In this case, we would start with @q{Notes and lyrics} (for the
soprano part).
@example
-\version "2.6.0"
+\version "2.11.23"
melody = \relative c' @{
\clef treble
\key c \major
\score@{
<<
- \context Voice = one @{
+ \new Voice = "one" @{
\autoBeamOff
\melody
@}
- \lyricsto "one" \new Lyrics \text
+ \new Lyrics \lyricsto "one" \text
>>
\layout @{ @}
- \midi @{ \tempo 4=60 @}
+ \midi @{ @}
@}
@end example
-Now we want to add a cello part. Let's look at the ``Notes only'' example:
+Now we want to add a cello part. Let's look at the @q{Notes only} example:
@example
-\version "2.6.0"
+\version "2.11.23"
melody = \relative c' @{
\clef treble
\key c \major
a4 b c d
@}
-
+
\score @{
\new Staff \melody
\layout @{ @}
-\midi @{ \tempo 4=60 @}
+\midi @{ @}
@}
@end example
@code{\layout} or @code{\midi}.
If we simply cut and paste the @code{melody} section, we would end up with
-two @code{melody} sections. So let's rename them. We'll call the one
-for the soprano @code{sopranoMusic}, and the one for the cello can be
-called @code{celloMusic}. While we're doing this, let's rename @code{text}
+two @code{melody} sections. So let's rename them. We'll call the section
+for the soprano @code{sopranoMusic} and the section for the cello
+@code{celloMusic}. While we're doing this, let's rename @code{text}
to be @code{sopranoLyrics}. Remember to rename both instances of all
these names -- both the initial definition (the
@code{melody = relative c' @{ } part) and the name's use (in the
notes.
@example
-\version "2.6.0"
+\version "2.11.23"
sopranoMusic = \relative c' @{
\clef treble
\key c \major
\score@{
<<
- \context Voice = one @{
+ \new Voice = "one" @{
\autoBeamOff
\sopranoMusic
@}
- \lyricsto "one" \new Lyrics \sopranoLyrics
+ \new Lyrics \lyricsto "one" \sopranoLyrics
>>
\layout @{ @}
- \midi @{ \tempo 4=60 @}
+ \midi @{ @}
@}
@end example
@noindent
underneath the soprano stuff. We also need to add @code{<<} and
@code{>>} around the music -- that tells LilyPond that there's
-more than one thing (in this case staff) happening at once. The
+more than one thing (in this case, @code{Staff}) happening at once. The
@code{\score} looks like this now
@example
\score@{
-<<
<<
- \context Voice = one @{
- \autoBeamOff
- \sopranoMusic
- @}
- \lyricsto "one" \new Lyrics \sopranoLyrics
+ <<
+ \new Voice = "one" @{
+ \autoBeamOff
+ \sopranoMusic
+ @}
+ \new Lyrics \lyricsto "one" \sopranoLyrics
+ >>
+ \new Staff \celloMusic
>>
- \new Staff \celloMusic
->>
\layout @{ @}
- \midi @{ \tempo 4=60 @}
+ \midi @{ @}
@}
@end example
This looks a bit messy; the indentation is messed up now. That is
easily fixed. Here's the complete soprano and cello template.
-@lilypond[quote,verbatim,raggedright]
-\version "2.6.0"
+@lilypond[quote,verbatim,ragged-right]
+\version "2.11.23"
sopranoMusic = \relative c' {
\clef treble
\key c \major
\score{
<<
- <<
- \context Voice = one {
- \autoBeamOff
- \sopranoMusic
- }
- \lyricsto "one" \new Lyrics \sopranoLyrics
- >>
- \new Staff \celloMusic
+ <<
+ \new Voice = "one" {
+ \autoBeamOff
+ \sopranoMusic
+ }
+ \new Lyrics \lyricsto "one" \sopranoLyrics
+ >>
+ \new Staff \celloMusic
>>
\layout { }
- \midi { \tempo 4=60 }
+ \midi { }
}
@end lilypond
-@node Fixing overlapping notation
-@section Fixing overlapping notation
+@node How LilyPond files work
+@section How LilyPond files work
-This may come as a surprise, but LilyPond isn't perfect. Some notation
-elements can overlap. This is unfortunate, but (in most cases) is easily
-solved.
+The LilyPond input format is quite free-form, giving experienced
+users a lot of flexibility to structure their files however they
+wish. However, this flexibility can make things confusing for
+new users. This section will explain some of this structure, but
+may gloss over some details in favor of simplicity. For a complete
+description of the input format, see @ref{File structure}.
-@lilypond[quote,fragment,raggedright,verbatim,relative=2]
-e4^\markup{ \italic ritenuto } g b e
-@end lilypond
+Most examples in this manual are little snippets -- for example
+
+@example
+c4 a b c
+@end example
-@cindex padding
+As you are (hopefully) aware by now, this will not compile by
+itself. These examples are shorthand for complete
+examples. They all need at least curly braces to compile
-The easiest solution is to increase the distance between the object
-(in this case text, but it could easily be fingerings or dynamics
-instead) and the note. In LilyPond, this is called the
-@code{padding} property. For most objects, it is around 1.0 or
-less (it varies with each object). We want to increase it, so let's
-try 1.5
+@example
+@{
+ c4 a b c
+@}
+@end example
-@lilypond[quote,fragment,raggedright,verbatim,relative=2]
-\once \override TextScript #'padding = #1.5
-e4^\markup{ \italic ritenuto } g b e
+Most examples also make use of the @code{\relative c'}
+(or @code{c''}) command. This is not necessary to merely
+compile the examples, but in most cases the output will
+look very odd if you omit the @code{\relative c'}.
+
+@lilypond[quote,fragment,ragged-right,verbatim]
+\relative c'' {
+ c4 a b c
+}
@end lilypond
-That looks better, but it isn't quite big enough. After experimenting
-with a few values, we think 2.3 is the best number in this case. However,
-this number is merely the result of experimentation and my personal
-taste in notation. Try the above example with 2.3... but also try higher
-(and lower) numbers. Which do you think looks the best?
+Now we get to the only real stumbling block: LilyPond
+input in this form is actually @emph{another}
+shorthand. Although it compiles and displays the
+correct output, it is shorthand for
-@cindex extra-offset
+@example
+\score @{
+ \relative c'' @{
+ c4 a b c
+ @}
+@}
+@end example
+
+A @code{\score} must begin with a single music
+expression. Remember that a music expression could
+be anything from a single note to a huge
-Another solution gives us complete control over placing the object -- we
-can move it horizontally or vertically. This is done with the
-@code{extra-offset} property. It is slightly more complicated and can
-cause other problems. When we move objects with @code{extra-offset},
-the movement is done after LilyPond has placed all other objects. This means
-that the result can overlap with other objects.
+@example
+@{
+ \new GrandStaff <<
+ insert the whole score of a Wagner opera in here
+ >>
+@}
+@end example
+
+@noindent
+Since everything is inside @code{@{ ... @}}, it counts
+as one music expression.
+
+The @code{\score} can contain other things, such as
+
+@example
+\score @{
+ @{ c'4 a b c' @}
+ \layout @{ @}
+ \midi @{ @}
+ \header @{ @}
+@}
+@end example
+
+@noindent
+Some people put some of those commands outside the
+@code{\score} block -- for example, @code{\header} is
+often placed above the @code{\score}. That's just
+another shorthand that LilyPond accepts.
+
+@cindex variables
+@cindex identifiers
+
+Another great shorthand is the ability to define
+variables. All the templates use this
+
+@example
+melody = \relative c' @{
+ c4 a b c
+@}
+
+\score @{
+ @{ \melody @}
+@}
+@end example
+
+When LilyPond looks at this file, it takes the value of
+@code{melody} (everything after the equals sign) and
+inserts it whenever it sees
+@code{\melody}. There's nothing special about the
+names -- it could be @code{melody}, @code{global},
+@code{pianorighthand}, or @code{foofoobarbaz}. You
+can use whatever variable names you want. For
+more details, see
+@ref{Saving typing with identifiers and functions}.
+
+For a complete definition
+of the input format, see @ref{File structure}.
+
+
+@node Score is a single musical expression
+@section Score is a single musical expression
+
+In the previous section, @ref{How LilyPond files work},
+we saw the general organization of LilyPond input
+files. But we seemed to skip over the most important
+part: how do we figure out what to write after
+@code{\score}?
+
+We didn't skip over it at all. The big mystery is simply
+that there @emph{is} no mystery. This line explains it
+all:
+
+@quotation
+@emph{A @code{\score} must begin with a single music expression.}
+@end quotation
+
+@noindent
+You may find it useful to review
+@ref{Music expressions explained}. In that section, we
+saw how to build big music expressions from small
+pieces -- we started from notes, then chords, etc. Now
+we're going to start from a big music expression and
+work our way down.
+
+@example
+\score @{
+ @{ % this brace begins the overall music expression
+ \new GrandStaff <<
+ insert the whole score of a Wagner opera in here
+ >>
+ @} % this brace ends the overall music expression
+ \layout @{ @}
+@}
+@end example
-@lilypond[quote,fragment,raggedright,verbatim,relative=2]
-\once \override TextScript #'extra-offset = #'( 1.0 . -1.0 )
-e4^\markup{ \italic ritenuto } g b e
+A whole Wagner opera would easily double the length of
+this manual, so let's just do a singer and piano. We
+don't need a @code{GrandStaff} for this ensemble, so we
+shall remove it. We @emph{do} need a singer and a piano,
+though.
+
+@example
+\score @{
+ @{
+ <<
+ \new Staff = "singer" <<
+ >>
+ \new PianoStaff = piano <<
+ >>
+ >>
+ @}
+ \layout @{ @}
+@}
+@end example
+
+Remember that we use @code{<<} and @code{>>} to show
+simultaneous music. And we definitely want to show
+the vocal part and piano part at the same time!
+
+@example
+\score @{
+ @{
+ <<
+ \new Staff = "singer" <<
+ \new Voice = "vocal" @{ @}
+ >>
+ \new Lyrics \lyricsto vocal \new Lyrics @{ @}
+ \new PianoStaff = "piano" <<
+ \new Staff = "upper" @{ @}
+ \new Staff = "lower" @{ @}
+ >>
+ >>
+ @}
+ \layout @{ @}
+@}
+@end example
+
+Now we have a lot more details. We have the singer's
+staff: it contains a @code{Voice} (in LilyPond, this
+term refers to a set of notes, not necessarily vocal
+notes -- for example, a violin generally plays one
+voice) and some lyrics. We also have a piano staff:
+it contains an upper staff (right hand) and a lower
+staff (left hand).
+
+At this stage, we could start filling in notes. Inside
+the curly braces next to @code{\new Voice = vocal},
+we could start writing
+
+@example
+\relative c'' @{
+ a4 b c d
+@}
+@end example
+
+But if we did that, the @code{\score} section would
+get pretty long, and it would be harder to understand
+what was happening. So let's use identifiers (or
+variables) instead.
+
+@example
+melody = @{ @}
+text = @{ @}
+upper = @{ @}
+lower = @{ @}
+\score @{
+ @{
+ <<
+ \new Staff = "singer" <<
+ \new Voice = "vocal" @{ \melody @}
+ >>
+ \new Lyrics \lyricsto vocal \new Lyrics @{ \text @}
+ \new PianoStaff = "piano" <<
+ \new Staff = "upper" @{ \upper @}
+ \new Staff = "lower" @{ \lower @}
+ >>
+ >>
+ @}
+ \layout @{ @}
+@}
+@end example
+
+@noindent
+Remember that you can use almost any name you like. The
+limitations on identifier names are detailed in
+@ref{File structure}.
+
+When writing a @code{\score} section, or when reading
+one, just take it slowly and carefully. Start with
+the outer layer, then work on each smaller
+layer. It also really helps to be strict with
+indentation -- make sure that each item on the same
+layer starts on the same horizontal position in your
+text editor!
+
+
+
+
+
+
+@node An orchestral part
+@section An orchestral part
+
+In orchestral music, all notes are printed twice. Once in a part for
+the musicians, and once in a full score for the conductor. Identifiers can
+be used to avoid double work. The music is entered once, and stored in
+a variable. The contents of that variable is then used to generate
+both the part and the full score.
+
+It is convenient to define the notes in a special file. For example,
+suppose that the file @file{horn-music.ly} contains the following part
+of a horn/@/bassoon duo
+
+@example
+hornNotes = \relative c @{
+ \time 2/4
+ r4 f8 a cis4 f e d
+@}
+@end example
+
+@noindent
+Then, an individual part is made by putting the following in a file
+
+@example
+\include "horn-music.ly"
+\header @{
+ instrument = "Horn in F"
+@}
+
+@{
+ \transpose f c' \hornNotes
+@}
+@end example
+
+The line
+
+@example
+\include "horn-music.ly"
+@end example
+
+@noindent
+substitutes the contents of @file{horn-music.ly} at this position in
+the file, so @code{hornNotes} is defined afterwards. The command
+@code{\transpose f@tie{}c'} indicates that the argument, being
+@code{\hornNotes}, should be transposed by a fifth upwards. Sounding
+@samp{f} is denoted by notated @code{c'}, which corresponds with the
+tuning of a normal French Horn in@tie{}F. The transposition can be seen
+in the following output
+
+@lilypond[quote,ragged-right]
+\transpose f c' \relative c {
+ \time 2/4
+ r4 f8 a cis4 f e d
+}
@end lilypond
-With @code{extra-offset}, the first number controls the horizontal
-movement (left is negative); the second number controls the vertial
-movement (up is positive). After a bit of experimenting, we decided
-that these values look good
+In ensemble pieces, one of the voices often does not play for many
+measures. This is denoted by a special rest, the multi-measure
+rest. It is entered with a capital @samp{R} followed by a duration
+(@code{1}@tie{}for a whole note, @code{2}@tie{}for a half note,
+etc.). By multiplying the
+duration, longer rests can be constructed. For example, this rest
+takes 3@tie{}measures in 2/4 time
-@lilypond[quote,fragment,raggedright,verbatim,relative=2]
-\once \override TextScript #'extra-offset = #'( -1.6 . 1.0 )
-e4^\markup{ \italic ritenuto } g b e
+@example
+R2*3
+@end example
+
+When printing the part, multi-rests
+must be condensed. This is done by setting a run-time variable
+
+@example
+\set Score.skipBars = ##t
+@end example
+
+@noindent
+This command sets the property @code{skipBars} in the
+@code{Score} context to true (@code{##t}). Prepending the rest and
+this option to the music above, leads to the following result
+
+@lilypond[quote,ragged-right]
+\transpose f c' \relative c {
+ \time 2/4
+ \set Score.skipBars = ##t
+ R2*3
+ r4 f8 a cis4 f e d
+}
@end lilypond
+
+The score is made by combining all of the music together. Assuming
+that the other voice is in @code{bassoonNotes} in the file
+@file{bassoon-music.ly}, a score is made with
+
+@example
+\include "bassoon-music.ly"
+\include "horn-music.ly"
+
+<<
+ \new Staff \hornNotes
+ \new Staff \bassoonNotes
+>>
+@end example
+
@noindent
-Again, these numbers are simply the result of a few experiments and
-looking at the output. You might prefer the text to be slightly higher,
-or to the left, or whatever. Try it and look at the result!
+leading to
+
+@lilypond[quote,ragged-right]
+\relative c <<
+ \new Staff {
+ \time 2/4 R2*3
+ r4 f8 a cis4 f e d
+ }
+ \new Staff {
+ \clef bass
+ r4 d,8 f | gis4 c | b bes |
+ a8 e f4 | g d | gis f
+ }
+>>
+@end lilypond
+More in-depth information on preparing parts and scores can be found
+in the notation manual; see @ref{Orchestral music}.
-@seealso
+Setting run-time variables (@q{properties}) is discussed in
+@ref{Changing context properties on the fly}.
-This manual: @ref{The \override command}, @ref{Common tweaks}.
projects / lilypond.git / blobdiff