Fix some bugs in the dynamic engraver and PostScript backend

[lilypond.git] / Documentation / user / introduction.itely

diff --git a/Documentation/user/introduction.itely b/Documentation/user/introduction.itely
index e0cdab08dd69e83e753c1a26562dc3f5857eb5b8..57169827742bd242cec1cc7bf8252f11f141988d 100644 (file)
--- a/Documentation/user/introduction.itely
+++ b/Documentation/user/introduction.itely
@@ -6,12 +6,12 @@
 
 
 @menu
-* Engraving::
-* Automated engraving::
-* What symbols to engrave?::
-* Music representation::
-* Example applications::
-* About this manual::
+* Engraving::                   
+* Automated engraving::         
+* What symbols to engrave?::    
+* Music representation::        
+* Example applications::        
+* About this manual::           
 @end menu
 
 
@@ -82,7 +82,8 @@ computer edition.
 @end ifnotinfo
 @ifinfo
 @c workaround for makeinfo-4.6: line breaks and multi-column cookies
-@image{henle-flat-bw,,,png} @image{baer-flat-bw,,,png} @image{lily-flat-bw,,,png}
+@image{henle-flat-bw,,,png} @image{baer-flat-bw,,,png}
+@image{lily-flat-bw,,,png}
 @end ifinfo
 
 @item @tab
@@ -122,7 +123,7 @@ music = {
    \stemDown
    b'8[ e'' a' e'']
    \stemNeutral
-   e'8[ e'8 e'8 e'8]  
+   e'8[ e'8 e'8 e'8]
 }
 
 \score
@@ -148,7 +149,7 @@ music = {
    \stemDown
    b'8[ e'' a' e'']
    \stemNeutral
-   e'8[ e'8 e'8 e'8]  
+   e'8[ e'8 e'8 e'8]
 }
 \score
 {
@@ -172,7 +173,8 @@ constant rhythm.  The spacing should reflect that.  Unfortunately, the
 eye deceives us a little; not only does it notice the distance between
 note heads, it also takes into account the distance between
 consecutive stems.  As a result, the notes of an up-stem/@/down-stem
-combination should be put farther apart, and the notes of a down-stem/@/up-stem
+combination should be put farther apart, and the notes of a
+down-stem/@/up-stem
 combination should be put closer together, all depending on the
 combined vertical positions of the notes.  The first two measures are
 printed with this correction, the last two measures without.  The notes
@@ -340,11 +342,11 @@ fragment.
    <d f g>
    \once \override NoteHead #'style = #'cross
    <d f g>
-   \applyOutput #mc-squared
+   \applyOutput #'Voice #mc-squared
    <d f g>
    <<
       { d8[ es-( fis^^ g] fis2-) }
-      \repeat unfold 5 { \applyOutput #mc-squared s8 }
+      \repeat unfold 5 { \applyOutput #'Voice #mc-squared s8 }
    >>
 }
 @end lilypond
@@ -515,7 +517,7 @@ polyphony?  In polyphonic notation, many voices can share a staff.
 
 @lilypond[quote,ragged-right]
 \include "engraver-example.ily"
-\new Staff << \topVoice \\ \botVoice >> 
+\new Staff << \topVoice \\ \botVoice >>
 @end lilypond
 
 In this situation, the accidentals and staff are shared, but the stems,
@@ -581,7 +583,7 @@ c4
 @noindent
 Chords can be constructed with @code{<<} and @code{>>} enclosing the notes
 
-@c < > is not a music expression, 
+@c < > is not a music expression,
 @c so we use <<>> iso. <> to drive home the point of
 @c expressions.  Don't change this back --hwn.
 @example