Guide, node Updating translation committishes..
@end ignore
-@c \version "2.12.0"
+@c \version "2.15.18"
@node Interfaces for programmers
@chapter Interfaces for programmers
@ref{Scheme tutorial}.
@menu
+* Lilypond code blocks::
+* Scheme functions::
* Music functions::
+* Event functions::
* Markup functions::
* Contexts for programmers::
* Callback functions::
* Difficult tweaks::
@end menu
+@node Lilypond code blocks
+@section Lilypond code blocks
+
+Lilypond code blocks look like
+@example
+ #@{ @var{Lilypond code} #@}
+@end example
+They can be used anywhere where you can write Scheme code: the Scheme
+reader actually is changed for accommodating LilyPond code blocks and
+can deal with embedded Scheme expressions starting with @code{$}
+and@w{ }@code{#}.
+
+It extracts the Lilypond code block and generates a call to the
+LilyPond @code{parser} which is executed at runtime to interpret the
+LilyPond code block. Any embedded Scheme expression is executed in
+the lexical environment of the Lilypond code block, so you have access
+to local variables and function parameters at the point the Lilypond
+code block is written.
+
+A LilyPond code block may contain anything that you can use on the right
+side of an assignment. In addition, an empty LilyPond block corresponds
+to a void music expression, and a LilyPond block containing multiple
+music events gets turned into a sequential music expression.
+
+@node Scheme functions
+@section Scheme functions
+@cindex Scheme functions (LilyPond syntax)
+
+@emph{Scheme functions} are Scheme procedures that can create Scheme
+expressions from input written in LilyPond syntax. They can be called
+in pretty much all places where using @code{#} for specifying a value in
+Scheme syntax is allowed. While Scheme has functions of its own, this
+chapter is concerned with @emph{syntactic} functions, functions that
+receive arguments specified in LilyPond syntax.
+
+@menu
+* Scheme function definitions::
+* Scheme function usage::
+* Void scheme functions::
+@end menu
+
+@node Scheme function definitions
+@subsection Scheme function definitions
+@funindex define-scheme-function
+
+The general form for defining scheme functions is:
+
+@example
+function =
+#(define-scheme-function
+ (parser location @var{arg1} @var{arg2} @dots{})
+ (@var{type1?} @var{type2?} @dots{})
+ @var{body})
+@end example
+
+@noindent
+where
+
+@multitable @columnfractions .33 .66
+@item @code{parser}
+@tab needs to be literally @code{parser} in order to give LilyPond code
+blocks (@code{#@{}@dots{}@code{#@}}) access to the parser.
+
+@item @code{@var{argN}}
+@tab @var{n}th argument
+
+@item @code{@var{typeN?}}
+@tab a Scheme @emph{type predicate} for which @code{@var{argN}}
+must return @code{#t}. Some of these predicates are specially
+recognized by the parser, see below. There is also a special form
+@code{(@emph{predicate?} @emph{default})} for specifying optional
+arguments. If the actual argument is missing when the function is being
+called, the default value is substituted instead. Default values are
+evaluated at definition time (including LilyPond code blocks!), so if
+you need a default calculated at runtime, instead write a special value
+you can easily recognize. If you write the predicate in parentheses but
+don't follow it with a default value, @code{#f} is used as the default.
+Default values are not verified with @emph{predicate?} at either
+definition or run time: it is your responsibility to deal with the
+values you specify. Default values that happen to be music expressions
+are copied while setting @code{origin} to the @code{location} parameter.
+
+@item @code{@var{body}}
+@tab A sequence of Scheme forms evaluated in order, the last one being
+used as the return value of the scheme function. It may contain
+LilyPond code blocks enclosed in hashed braces
+(@tie{}@w{@code{#@{@dots{}#@}}}@tie{}), like described in @ref{Lilypond
+code blocks}. Within LilyPond code blocks, use @code{#} to reference
+function arguments (eg., @samp{#arg1}) or to start an inline Scheme
+expression containing function arguments (eg., @w{@samp{#(cons arg1
+arg2)}}). Where normal Scheme expressions using @code{#} don't do the
+trick, you might need to revert to immediate Scheme expressions using
+@code{$}, for example as @samp{$music}.
+
+If your function returns a music expression, it is given a useful value
+of @code{origin}.
+@end multitable
+
+@noindent
+Some type predicates are specially handled by the parser since it
+can't recognize the arguments reliably otherwise. Currently these are
+@code{ly:pitch?} and @code{ly:duration?}.
+
+Suitability of arguments for all other predicates is determined by
+actually calling the predicate after Lilypond has already converted them
+into a Scheme expression. As a consequence, the argument can be
+specified in Scheme syntax if desired (introduced with @code{#} or as
+the result of calling a scheme function), but Lilypond will also convert
+a number of Lilypond constructs into Scheme before actually checking the
+predicate on them. Currently, those include music, postevents, simple
+strings (with or without quotes), numbers, full markups and markup
+lists, score, book, bookpart, context definition and output definition
+blocks.
+
+For some kinds of expression (like most music not enclosed in braces)
+Lilypond needs to look further than the expression itself in order to
+determine its end. If such an expression were considered for an
+optional argument by evaluating its predicate, Lilypond would not be
+able to ``backup'' when it decides the expression does not fit the
+parameter. So some forms of music might need to be enclosed in braces
+to make them acceptable to Lilypond. There are also some other
+ambiguities that Lilypond sorts out by checking with predicate
+functions: is @samp{-3} a fingering postevent or a negative number? Is
+@code{"a" 4} in lyric mode a string followed by a number, or a lyric
+event of duration @code{4}? Lilypond decides by asking the predicates.
+That means that you should avoid permissive predicates like
+@code{scheme?} if you have a particular use in mind instead of a general
+purpose function.
+
+For a list of available predefined type predicates, see
+@ruser{Predefined type predicates}.
+
+@seealso
+
+Notation Reference:
+@ruser{Predefined type predicates}.
+
+Installed Files:
+@file{lily/music-scheme.cc},
+@file{scm/c++.scm},
+@file{scm/lily.scm}.
+
+@node Scheme function usage
+@subsection Scheme function usage
+
+Scheme functions can be called pretty much anywhere where a Scheme
+expression starting with @code{#} can be written. You call a scheme
+function by writing its name preceded by @code{\}, followed by its
+arguments. Once an optional argument predicate does not match an
+argument, Lilypond skips this and all following optional arguments,
+replacing them with their specified default, and @q{backs up} the
+argument that did not match to the place of the next mandatory argument.
+Since the backed up argument needs to go somewhere, optional arguments
+are not actually considered optional unless followed by a mandatory
+argument.
+
+There is one exception: if you write @code{\default} in the place of an
+optional argument, this and all following optional arguments are skipped
+and replaced by their default. This works even when no mandatory
+argument follows since @code{\default} does not need to get backed up.
+The @code{mark} and @code{key} commands make use of that trick to
+provide their default behavior when just followed by @code{\default}.
+
+Apart from places where a Scheme value is required, there are a few
+places where @code{#} expressions are currently accepted and evaluated
+for their side effects but otherwise ignored. Mostly those are the
+places where an assignment would be acceptable as well.
+
+Since it is a bad idea to return values that can be misinterpreted in
+some context, you should use normal scheme functions only for those
+cases where you always return a useful value, and use void scheme
+functions (@pxref{Void scheme functions}) otherwise.
+
+@node Void scheme functions
+@subsection Void scheme functions
+@funindex define-void-function
+@funindex \void
+
+Sometimes a procedure is executed in order to perform an action rather
+than return a value. Some programming languages (like C and Scheme) use
+functions for either concept and just discard the returned value
+(usually by allowing any expression to act as statement, ignoring the
+result). This is clever but error-prone: most C compilers nowadays
+offer warnings for various non-``void'' expressions being discarded.
+For many functions executing an action, the Scheme standards declare the
+return value to be unspecified. Lilypond's Scheme interpreter Guile has
+a unique value @code{*unspecified*} that it usually (such when using
+@code{set!} directly on a variable) but unfortunately not consistently
+returns in such cases.
+
+Defining a Lilypond function with @code{define-void-function} makes
+sure that this special value (the only value satisfying the predicate
+@code{void?}) will be returned.
+
+@example
+noPointAndClick =
+#(define-void-function
+ (parser location)
+ ()
+ (ly:set-option 'point-and-click #f))
+...
+\noPointAndClick % disable point and click
+@end example
+
+If you want to evaluate an expression only for its side-effect and
+don't want any value it may return interpreted, you can do so by
+prefixing it with @code{\void}:
+
+@example
+\void #(hashq-set! some-table some-key some-value)
+@end example
+
+That way, you can be sure that Lilypond will not assign meaning to the
+returned value regardless of where it encounters it. This will also
+work for music functions such as @code{\displayMusic}.
@node Music functions
@section Music functions
-@emph{Music functions} are scheme procedures that can create music
+@cindex music functions
+
+@emph{Music functions} are Scheme procedures that can create music
expressions automatically, and can be used to greatly simplify the
input file.
@menu
-* Music function syntax::
+* Music function definitions::
+* Music function usage::
* Simple substitution functions::
* Intermediate substitution functions::
* Mathematics in functions::
* Functions without arguments::
-* Void functions::
+* Void music functions::
@end menu
-@node Music function syntax
-@subsection Music function syntax
+@node Music function definitions
+@subsection Music function definitions
+@cindex defining music functions
+@funindex define-music-function
-The general form for music functions is:
+The general form for defining music functions is:
@example
function =
#(define-music-function
(parser location @var{arg1} @var{arg2} @dots{})
(@var{type1?} @var{type2?} @dots{})
- @var{music})
+ @var{body})
@end example
@noindent
-where
-
-@multitable @columnfractions .33 .66
-@item @code{@var{argN}}
-@tab @var{n}th argument
-
-@item @code{@var{typeN?}}
-@tab a scheme @emph{type predicate} for which @code{@var{argN}}
-must return @code{#t}.
+quite in analogy to @ref{Scheme function definitions}. More often than
+not, @var{body} will be a @ref{Lilypond code blocks, Lilypond code block}.
-@item @code{@var{music}}
-@tab A music expression, optionally written in scheme, with any
-LilyPond code enclosed in hashed braces
-(@tie{}@w{@code{#@{@dots{}#@}}}@tie{}). Within LilyPond code
-blocks, use @code{$} to reference function arguments (eg.,
-@samp{$arg1}) or to start an inline scheme expression containing
-function arguments (eg., @w{@samp{$(cons arg1 arg2)}}).
-
-@end multitable
-
-@noindent
For a list of available type predicates, see
-@ruser{Predefined type predicates}. User-defined type predicates
-are also allowed.
-
+@ruser{Predefined type predicates}.
@seealso
@file{scm/lily.scm}.
+@node Music function usage
+@subsection Music function usage
+Music functions may currently be used in several places. Depending on
+where they are used, restrictions apply in order to be able to parse
+them unambiguously. The result a music function returns must be
+compatible with the context in which it is called.
+
+@itemize
+@item
+At top level in a music expression. No restriction apply here.
+
+@item
+As a post-event, explicitly started with a direction indicator (one of
+@code{-}, @code{^}, @w{and @code{_}}). Note that returning a post-event
+will be acceptable for music functions called as normal music, leading
+to a result roughly equivalent to
+@example
+s 1*0-\fun
+@end example
+
+In this case, you can't use an @emph{open} music expression as the last
+argument, one that would end with a music expression able to accept
+additional postevents.
+
+@item
+As a chord constituent. The returned expression must be of
+@code{rhythmic-event} type, most likely a @code{NoteEvent}.
+@end itemize
+
+@noindent
+The special rules for trailing arguments make it possible to write
+polymorphic functions like @code{\tweak} that can be applied to
+different constructs.
+
@node Simple substitution functions
@subsection Simple substitution functions
and LilyPond code in the music expression to be returned.
Some @code{\override} commands require an argument consisting of
-a pair of numbers (called a @code{cons cell} in Scheme).
+a pair of numbers (called a @emph{cons cell} in Scheme).
The pair can be directly passed into the music function,
using a @code{pair?} variable:
(parser location beg-end)
(pair?)
#@{
- \once \override Beam #'positions = $beg-end
+ \once \override Beam #'positions = #beg-end
#@})
\relative c' @{
(parser location beg end)
(number? number?)
#{
- \once \override Beam #'positions = $(cons beg end)
+ \once \override Beam #'positions = #(cons beg end)
#})
\relative c' {
(parser location mag)
(number?)
#{
- \override Stem #'length = $(* 7.0 mag)
+ \override Stem #'length = #(* 7.0 mag)
\override NoteHead #'font-size =
- $(inexact->exact (* (/ 6.0 (log 2.0)) (log mag)))
+ #(inexact->exact (* (/ 6.0 (log 2.0)) (log mag)))
#})
AltOff = {
(parser location mag music)
(number? ly:music?)
#{
- \override Stem #'length = $(* 7.0 mag)
+ \override Stem #'length = #(* 7.0 mag)
\override NoteHead #'font-size =
- $(inexact->exact (* (/ 6.0 (log 2.0)) (log mag)))
- $music
+ #(inexact->exact (* (/ 6.0 (log 2.0)) (log mag)))
+ #music
\revert Stem #'length
\revert NoteHead #'font-size
#})
@end example
-@node Void functions
-@subsection Void functions
+@node Void music functions
+@subsection Void music functions
-A music function must return a music expression, but sometimes we
-may want to have a function that does not involve music (such as
-turning off Point and Click). To do this, we return a @code{void}
-music expression.
+A music function must return a music expression. If you want to
+execute a function only for its side effect, you should use
+@code{define-void-function}. But there may be cases where you
+sometimes want to produce a music expression, and sometimes not (like
+in the previous example). Returning a @code{void} music expression
+via @code{#@{ #@}} will achieve that.
-That is why the form that is returned is the
-@w{@code{(make-music @dots{})}}. With the @code{'void} property
-set to @code{#t}, the parser is told to actually disregard this
-returned music expression. Thus the important part of the void
-music function is the processing done by the function, not the
-music expression that is returned.
+@node Event functions
+@section Event functions
+@funindex define-event-function
+@cindex event functions
-@example
-noPointAndClick =
-#(define-music-function
- (parser location)
- ()
- (ly:set-option 'point-and-click #f)
- (make-music 'SequentialMusic 'void #t))
-...
-\noPointAndClick % disable point and click
-@end example
+To use a music function in the place of an event, you need to write a
+direction indicator before it. But sometimes, this does not quite match
+the syntax of constructs you want to replace. For example, if you want
+to write dynamics commands, those are usually attached without direction
+indicator, like @code{c'\pp}. Here is a way to write arbitrary
+dynamics:
+@lilypond[quote,verbatim,ragged-right]
+dyn=#(define-event-function (parser location arg) (markup?)
+ (make-dynamic-script arg))
+\relative c' { c\dyn pfsss }
+@end lilypond
+You could do the same using a music function, but then you always would
+have to write a direction indicator before calling it, like
+@code{@w{c-\dyn pfsss}}.
@node Markup functions
@noindent
is equivalent to:
@example
-\markup \column @{ \line @{ \bold \italic "hello" \raise #0.4 "world" @}
- \larger \line @{ foo bar baz @} @}
+#@{ \markup \column @{ \line @{ \bold \italic "hello" \raise #0.4 "world" @}
+ \larger \line @{ foo bar baz @} @} #@}
@end example
@noindent
This example demonstrates the main translation rules between regular
-LilyPond markup syntax and Scheme markup syntax.
+LilyPond markup syntax and Scheme markup syntax. Using @code{#@{
+@dots{} #@}} for entering in LilyPond syntax will often be most
+convenient, but we explain how to use the @code{markup} macro to get a
+Scheme-only solution.
@quotation
@multitable @columnfractions .3 .3
@code{text example} string, and then it raises that Stencil by 0.5
staff space. This is a rather simple example; more complex examples
are in the rest
-of this section, and in @file{scm/@/define@/-markup@/-commands@/.scm}.
+of this section, and in @file{scm/define-markup-commands.scm}.
@node New markup command definition
The arguments are
-@table @var
-@item command-name
+@table @code
+@item @var{command-name}
the markup command name
@item layout
the @q{layout} definition.
@item props
a list of associative lists, containing all active properties.
-@item argi
+@item @var{argi}
@var{i}th command argument
-@item argi-type?
+@item @var{argi-type?}
a type predicate for the i@var{th} argument
@end table
-If the command uses properties from the @var{props} arguments, the
-@code{#:properties} keyword can be used, to specify which properties are
-used, and their default values.
-
-@knownissues
-There are restrictions on the possible arguments to a markup command.
+If the command uses properties from the @code{props} arguments,
+the @code{#:properties} keyword can be used to specify which
+properties are used along with their default values.
-Arguments are distingued according to their type:
+Arguments are distinguished according to their type:
@itemize
@item a markup, corresponding to type predicate @code{markup?};
-@item a list of markup, corresponding to type predicate
+@item a list of markups, corresponding to type predicate
@code{markup-list?};
@item any other scheme object, corresponding to type predicates such as
@code{list?}, @code{number?}, @code{boolean?}, etc.
@end itemize
-The available combinations of arguments (after the standard @var{layout}
-and @var{props} arguments) to a markup command defined with
-@code{define-markup-command} are limited as follows.
-
-@table @asis
-@item (no argument)
-@itemx @var{markup-list}
-@itemx @var{markup}
-@itemx @var{markup markup}
-@itemx @var{scheme}
-@itemx @var{scheme markup}
-@itemx @var{scheme scheme}
-@itemx @var{scheme scheme markup}
-@itemx @var{scheme scheme markup markup}
-@itemx @var{scheme markup markup}
-@itemx @var{scheme scheme scheme}
-@end table
-
-@noindent
-This means that it is not possible to define with e.g. three scheme
-arguments and a markup arguments, like:
-
-@example
-#(define-markup-command (foo layout props
- num1 num2 a-list a-markup)
- (number? number? list? markup?)
- ...)
-@end example
-
-@noindent
-If you apply it as, say,
-
-@example
-\markup \foo #1 #2 #'(bar baz) Blah
-@end example
+There is no limitation on the order of arguments (after the
+standard @code{layout} and @code{props} arguments). However,
+markup functions taking a markup as their last argument are
+somewhat special as you can apply them to a markup list, and the
+result is a markup list where the markup function (with the
+specified leading arguments) has been applied to every element of
+the original markup list.
-@cindex Scheme signature
-@cindex signature, Scheme
-@noindent
-@command{lilypond} complains that it cannot parse @code{foo} due to its
-unknown Scheme signature.
+Since replicating the leading arguments for applying a markup
+function to a markup list is cheap mostly for Scheme arguments,
+you avoid performance pitfalls by just using Scheme arguments for
+the leading arguments of markup functions that take a markup as
+their last argument.
@node On properties
@unnumberedsubsubsec On properties
override it too:
@lilypond[quote,verbatim,ragged-right]
-\markup \override #'(box-padding . 0.4) \box \override #'(box-padding . 0.6) \box A
+\markup \override #'(box-padding . 0.4) \box
+ \override #'(box-padding . 0.6) \box A
@end lilypond
Repeating this lengthy markup would be painful. This is where a markup
taking one argument (the text). This draws the two boxes, with some
padding.
+@lisp
+#(define-markup-command (double-box layout props text) (markup?)
+ "Draw a double box around text."
+ (interpret-markup layout props
+ #@{\markup \override #'(box-padding . 0.4) \box
+ \override #'(box-padding . 0.6) \box @{ #text @}#@}))
+@end lisp
+
+or, equivalently
+
@lisp
#(define-markup-command (double-box layout props text) (markup?)
"Draw a double box around text."
@code{text} is the name of the command argument, and @code{markup?} its
type: it identifies it as a markup. The @code{interpret-markup}
function is used in most of markup commands: it builds a stencil, using
-@code{layout}, @code{props}, and a markup. Here, this markup is built
-using the @code{markup} scheme macro, see @ref{Markup construction in Scheme}.
-The transformation from @code{\markup} expression to scheme
-markup expression is straight-forward.
+@code{layout}, @code{props}, and a markup. In the second case, this
+markup is built using the @code{markup} scheme macro, see @ref{Markup
+construction in Scheme}. The transformation from @code{\markup}
+expression to scheme markup expression is straight-forward.
The new command can be used as follow:
here, the @code{box-padding} values are hard coded, and cannot be
changed by the user. Also, it would be better to distinguish the
padding between the two boxes, from the padding between the inner box
-and the text. So we will introduce a new property,
-@code{inter-box-padding}, for the padding between the two boxes. The
+and the text. So we will introduce a new property,
+@code{inter-box-padding}, for the padding between the two boxes. The
@code{box-padding} will be used for the inner padding. The new code is
now as follows:
+@lisp
+#(define-markup-command (double-box layout props text) (markup?)
+ #:properties ((inter-box-padding 0.4)
+ (box-padding 0.6))
+ "Draw a double box around text."
+ (interpret-markup layout props
+ #@{\markup \override #`(box-padding . ,inter-box-padding) \box
+ \override #`(box-padding . ,box-padding) \box
+ @{ #text @} #@}))
+@end lisp
+
+Again, the equivalent version using the markup macro would be:
+
@lisp
#(define-markup-command (double-box layout props text) (markup?)
#:properties ((inter-box-padding 0.4)
(box-padding 0.6))
"Draw a double box around text."
(interpret-markup layout props
- (markup #:override `(box-padding . ,inter-box-padding) #:box
- #:override `(box-padding . ,box-padding) #:box text)))
+ #{\markup \override #`(box-padding . ,inter-box-padding) \box
+ \override #`(box-padding . ,box-padding) \box
+ { #text } #}))
\markup \double-box A
\markup \override #'(inter-box-padding . 0.8) \double-box A
A good way to start writing a new markup command, is to take example on
a builtin one. Most of the markup commands provided with LilyPond can be
-found in file @file{scm/@/define@/-markup@/-commands@/.scm}.
+found in file @file{scm/define-markup-commands.scm}.
For instance, we would like to adapt the @code{\draw-line} command, to
draw a double line instead. The @code{\draw-line} command is defined as
In the following example, a @code{\paragraph} markup list command is
defined, which returns a list of justified lines, the first one being
indented. The indent width is taken from the @code{props} argument.
+
+@example
+#(define-markup-list-command (paragraph layout props args) (markup-list?)
+ #:properties ((par-indent 2))
+ (interpret-markup-list layout props
+ #@{\markuplist \justified-lines @{ \hspace #par-indent #args @} #@}))
+@end example
+
+
+The version using just Scheme is more complex:
@example
#(define-markup-list-command (paragraph layout props args) (markup-list?)
#:properties ((par-indent 2))
First, the function gets the indent width, a property here named
@code{par-indent}, from the property list @code{props}. If the
property is not found, the default value is @code{2}. Then, a
-list of justified lines is made using the
-@code{make-justified-lines-markup-list} function, which is related
-to the @code{\justified-lines} built-in markup list command. A
-horizontal space is added at the beginning using the
-@code{make-hspace-markup} function. Finally, the markup list is
+list of justified lines is made using the built-in markup list command
+@code{\justified-lines}, which is related to the
+@code{make-justified-lines-markup-list} function. A
+horizontal space is added at the beginning using @code{\hspace} (or the
+@code{make-hspace-markup} function). Finally, the markup list is
interpreted using the @code{interpret-markup-list} function.
This new markup list command can be used as follows:
@example
-\markuplines @{
+\markuplist @{
\paragraph @{
The art of music typography is called \italic @{(plate) engraving.@}
The term derives from the traditional process of music printing.
\applyContext @var{function}
@end example
-@var{function} should be a Scheme function that takes a single
-argument: the context in which the @code{\applyContext} command is
-being called. The following code will print the current bar
-number on the standard output during the compile:
+@code{@var{function}} should be a Scheme function that takes a
+single argument: the context in which the @code{\applyContext}
+command is being called. The following code will print the
+current bar number on the standard output during the compile:
@example
\applyContext
@funindex \applyOutput
-The most versatile way of tuning an object is @code{\applyOutput}. Its
-syntax is
+The most versatile way of tuning an object is @code{\applyOutput} which
+works by inserting an event into the specified context
+(@rinternals{ApplyOutputEvent}). Its syntax is
@example
\applyOutput @var{context} @var{proc}
@end example
@noindent
-where @var{proc} is a Scheme function, taking three arguments.
+where @code{@var{proc}} is a Scheme function, taking three arguments.
-When interpreted, the function @var{proc} is called for every layout
-object found in the context @var{context}, with the following
-arguments:
+When interpreted, the function @code{@var{proc}} is called for
+every layout object found in the context @code{@var{context}} at
+the current time step, with the following arguments:
@itemize
@item the layout object itself,
@item the context where the layout object was created, and
In addition, the cause of the layout object, i.e., the music
expression or object that was responsible for creating it, is in the
object property @code{cause}. For example, for a note head, this is a
-@rinternals{NoteHead} event, and for a @rinternals{Stem} object,
-this is a @rinternals{NoteHead} object.
+@rinternals{NoteHead} event, and for a stem object,
+this is a @rinternals{Stem} object.
Here is a function to use for @code{\applyOutput}; it blanks
-note-heads on the center-line:
+note-heads on the center-line and next to it:
@lilypond[quote,verbatim,ragged-right]
#(define (blanker grob grob-origin context)
(if (and (memq 'note-head-interface (ly:grob-interfaces grob))
- (eq? (ly:grob-property grob 'staff-position) 0))
+ (< (abs (ly:grob-property grob 'staff-position)) 2))
(set! (ly:grob-property grob 'transparent) #t)))
\relative c' {
- e4 g8 \applyOutput #'Voice #blanker b d2
+ a'4 e8 <<\applyOutput #'Voice #blanker a c d>> b2
}
@end lilypond
@node Inline Scheme code
@section Inline Scheme code
+TODO: the example for this section is ill-chosen since
+@example
+F = -\tweak #'font-size #-3 -\flageolet
+@end example
+(note the @samp{-} marking it as a post event) will actually work fine
+for the stated purpose. Until this section gets a rewrite, let's
+pretend we don't know.
+
The main disadvantage of @code{\tweak} is its syntactical
inflexibility. For example, the following produces a syntax error.
@end example
@noindent
-In other words, @code{\tweak} doesn't behave like an articulation
-regarding the syntax; in particular, it can't be attached with
-@code{^} and @code{_}.
-
Using Scheme, this problem can be avoided. The route to the
result is given in @ref{Adding articulation to notes (example)},
especially how to use @code{\displayMusic} as a helping guide.
@lilypond[quote,verbatim,ragged-right]
#(define (my-callback grob)
- (let* (
- ; have we been split?
- (orig (ly:grob-original grob))
+ (let* (
+ ;; have we been split?
+ (orig (ly:grob-original grob))
- ; if yes, get the split pieces (our siblings)
- (siblings (if (ly:grob? orig)
- (ly:spanner-broken-into orig) '() )))
+ ;; if yes, get the split pieces (our siblings)
+ (siblings (if (ly:grob? orig)
+ (ly:spanner-broken-into orig)
+ '())))
- (if (and (>= (length siblings) 2)
- (eq? (car (last-pair siblings)) grob))
- (ly:grob-set-property! grob 'extra-offset '(-2 . 5)))))
+ (if (and (>= (length siblings) 2)
+ (eq? (car (last-pair siblings)) grob))
+ (ly:grob-set-property! grob 'extra-offset '(-2 . 5)))))
\relative c'' {
\override Tie #'after-line-breaking =
#my-callback
- c1 ~ \break c2 ~ c
+ c1 ~ \break
+ c2 ~ c
}
@end lilypond
@noindent
When applying this trick, the new @code{after-line-breaking} callback
-should also call the old one @code{after-line-breaking}, if there is
-one. For example, if using this with @code{Hairpin},
-@code{ly:hairpin::after-line-breaking} should also be called.
+should also call the old one, if such a default exists. For example,
+if using this with @code{Hairpin}, @code{ly:spanner::kill-zero-spanned-time}
+should also be called.
-@item Some objects cannot be changed with @code{\override} for
+@item
+Some objects cannot be changed with @code{\override} for
technical reasons. Examples of those are @code{NonMusicalPaperColumn}
and @code{PaperColumn}. They can be changed with the
@code{\overrideProperty} function, which works similar to @code{\once
projects / lilypond.git / blobdiff