CG: change some references from master to staging.

[lilypond.git] / Documentation / contributor / regressions.itexi

diff --git a/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi b/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi
index 2c7783c1d7828e578c0ca940e24ecc6eab006264..5de3f8aa918572a3cbe34e9b0b6ec1fda61e2b97 100644 (file)
--- a/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi
+++ b/Documentation/contributor/regressions.itexi
@@ -183,7 +183,8 @@ than building the source code, as described in
 @node Regtest comparison
 @section Regtest comparison
 
-Before modified code is committed to master, a regression test
+Before modified code is committed to @code{master} (via @code{staging}),
+a regression test
 comparison must be completed to ensure that the changes have
 not caused problems with previously working code.  The comparison
 is made automatically upon compiling the regression test suite
@@ -485,7 +486,9 @@ a small @file{.ly} file demonstrating the problem was added to the regression
 tests as a proof that the fix works.  If someone will accidentally break
 breve width again, we will notice this in the output of that regression test.
 
-We are asking you to help us by checking a regtest or two from time to time.
+@subheading How can I help?
+
+We ask you to help us by checking one or two regtests from time to time.
 You don't need programming skills to do this, not even LilyPond skills -
 just basic music notation knowledge; checking one regtest takes less than
 a minute.  Simply go here:
@@ -505,6 +508,7 @@ or @rinternalsnamed{Top, Internals Reference}.
 Vague descriptions (like "behaves well", "looks reasonable") shouldn't be used.
 
 @ignore
+this may be useful for advanced regtest checking
 @subsubheading Is regtest straightforward and systematic?
 
 Unfortunately some regtests are written poorly.  A good regtest should be