release: 1.5.19

[lilypond.git] / Documentation / bibliography / computer-notation.bib

diff --git a/Documentation/bibliography/computer-notation.bib b/Documentation/bibliography/computer-notation.bib
index faf176c99ce8dd2915ba2d4d515c5b95c35b3e69..c5a25053716ff1fcc998f175776406fbfa30aaba 100644 (file)
--- a/Documentation/bibliography/computer-notation.bib
+++ b/Documentation/bibliography/computer-notation.bib
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 @String{CitH = {Computing and the Humanities}}
 @String{CMJ = {Computer Music Journal}}
 
-@TechRep=ort{roush88,
+@TechReport{roush88,
   note  = {Rules on formatting music formulated for use in computers. Mainly distilled from [Ross] HWN},
   year = {1988},
   title = {Music Formatting Guidelines},
@@ -541,7 +541,8 @@ surprising that LilyPond is more mature.
   title = {how to read and write tab: a guide to tab notation},
   author = {Howard Wright},
   email={Howard.Wright@ed.ac.uk},
-  HTML={http://wabakimi.carleton.ca/~phacket2/guitar/tabfaq.html},
+  HTML={http://www.guitartabs.cc/tabfaq.shtml}
+%  HTML={http://wabakimi.carleton.ca/~phacket2/guitar/tabfaq.html},
 }
 
 
@@ -654,3 +655,19 @@ general rules, similar to\cite{parrish87-simultaneities}},
 
 note = {Placement of accidentals crystallised in an enormous set of
 rules.  Same remarks as for \cite{grover89-twovoices} applies} }
+
+@TechReport{,
+  author =      {Michael Droettboom},
+  title =       {Study of music Notation Description Languages},
+  year =        {2000},
+  OPTkey =      {},
+  OPTvolume =   {},
+  OPTnumber =   {},
+  OPTpages =    {},
+  OPTmonth =    {},
+  OPTnote =     {},
+  OPTannote =   {}
+html= {http://gigue.peabody.jhu.edu/~mdboom/format.pdf}
+annote ={Author compares GUIDO and lilypond. LilyPond wins on practical issues as usability and availability of tools, GUIDO wins on implementation simplicity.}
+}
+