-\input texinfo @c -*- coding: utf-8; mode: texinfo; -*-
+@c -*- coding: utf-8; mode: texinfo; -*-
@ignore
Translation of GIT committish: FILL-IN-HEAD-COMMITTISH
LilyPond 1.4:
@divClass{float-center}
+@c @ref{baer-sarabande-hires.png,
+@sourceimage{baer-sarabande,,,.png}
+@c }
@divEnd
-@ref{pictures/baer-sarabande-hires.jpeg,
-@image{pictures/baer-sarabande,,,.png}}
@divClass{float-center}
-@divEnd
B@"arenreiter (click to enlarge)
+@divEnd
@divClass{float-center}
+@sourceimage{lily14-sarabande,,,.png}
@divEnd
-@image{pictures/lily14-sarabande,,,.png}
@divClass{float-center}
-@divEnd
LilyPond 1.4
+@divEnd
The LilyPond output is certainly readable, and for many people it
would be acceptable. However, close comparison with a hand-engraved
score showed a lot of errors in the formatting details:
@divClass{float-center}
+@sourceimage{lily14-sarabande-correct,,,.png}
@divEnd
-@image{pictures/lily14-sarabande-correct,,,.png}
@divClass{float-center}
-@divEnd
@itemize
@item
Lots of symbols were unbalanced. In particular the trill sign was
@end itemize
+@divEnd
+
(And there were missing notes in the original version for LilyPond)
By addressing the relevant algorithms, settings, and font designs, we
output is very close to publication quality.
@divClass{float-center}
+@sourceimage{lily17-sarabande,,,.png}
@divEnd
-@image{pictures/lily17-sarabande,,,.png}
@divClass{float-center}
-@divEnd
LilyPond 1.8
+@divEnd
@divClass{float-center}
+@sourceimage{baer-sarabande,,,.png}
@divEnd
-@image{pictures/baer-sarabande,,,.png}
@divClass{float-center}
-@divEnd
B@"arenreiter
+@divEnd
Another example of benchmarking is our project for the 2.1 series, a
@ref{schubert,Schubert song}.
@divClass{float-right}
-@divEnd
-Next: @ref{typography-features.html,Cool features},
+Next: @ref{typography-features,Cool features},
typographical hoops that we made LilyPond jump through.
-
-@bye
-
+@divEnd