-#define DECLARE_SIMPLE_SMOBS(CL) \
- public: \
- SCM smobbed_copy () const; \
- DECLARE_BASE_SMOBS (CL)
-
-#define DECLARE_BASE_SMOBS(CL) \
- friend class Non_existent_class; \
- private: \
- static const char* smob_name_; \
- static scm_t_bits smob_tag_; \
- static SCM mark_smob (SCM); \
- static size_t free_smob (SCM s); \
- static int print_smob (SCM s, SCM p, scm_print_state*); \
- public: \
- static SCM equal_p (SCM a, SCM b); \
- static CL *unsmob (SCM s) __attribute__((pure)) \
- { \
- if (SCM_NIMP (s) && SCM_CELL_TYPE (s) == smob_tag_) \
- return (CL *) SCM_CELL_WORD_1 (s); \
- else \
- return 0; \
- } \
- static SCM smob_p (SCM); \
- static void init_smobs (); \
- private:
-
-#define DECLARE_SMOBS(CL) \
- DECLARE_BASE_SMOBS (CL) \
- protected: \
- virtual ~CL (); \
- SCM unprotected_smobify_self (); \
- private: \
- void smobify_self (); \
- SCM self_scm_; \
- SCM protection_cons_; \
- public: \
- SCM unprotect (); \
- void protect (); \
- SCM self_scm () const { return self_scm_; } \
- private:
-
-#define DECLARE_UNSMOB(CL, name) \
- inline CL * \
- unsmob_ ## name (SCM s) \
- { \
- return CL::unsmob (s); \
+// Initialization class. Create a variable or static data member of
+// this type at global scope (or creation will happen too late for
+// Scheme initialization), initialising with a function to be called.
+// Reference somewhere (like in the constructor of the containing
+// class) to make sure the variable is actually instantiated.
+
+class Scm_init {
+public:
+ Scm_init () { }
+ Scm_init (void (*fun) (void))
+ {
+ add_scm_init_func (fun);
+ }
+};
+
+template <class Super>
+class Smob_base
+{
+ static scm_t_bits smob_tag_;
+ static Scm_init scm_init_;
+ static void init (void);
+ static string smob_name_;
+ static Super *unchecked_unsmob (SCM s)
+ {
+ return reinterpret_cast<Super *> (SCM_SMOB_DATA (s));
+ }
+protected:
+ // reference scm_init_ in smob_tag which is sure to be called. The
+ // constructor, in contrast, may not be called at all in classes
+ // like Smob1.
+ static scm_t_bits smob_tag () { (void) scm_init_; return smob_tag_; }
+ Smob_base () { }
+ static SCM register_ptr (Super *p);
+ static Super *unregister_ptr (SCM obj);
+private:
+ // Those fallbacks are _only_ for internal use by Smob_base. They
+ // are characterized by no knowledge about the implemented type
+ // apart from the type's name. Overriding them as a template
+ // specialization is _not_ intended since a type-dependent
+ // implementation will in general need access to possibly private
+ // parts of the Super class. So any class-dependent override should
+ // be done by redefining the respective function in the Super class
+ // (where it will mask the private template member) rather than
+ // specializing a different template function/pointer.
+ //
+ // Most default functions are do-nothings. void init() will
+ // recognize their address when not overriden and will then refrain
+ // altogether from passing the the respective callbacks to GUILE.
+ SCM mark_smob (void);
+ static SCM mark_trampoline (SCM); // Used for calling mark_smob
+ static size_t free_smob (SCM obj);
+ static SCM equal_p (SCM, SCM);
+ int print_smob (SCM, scm_print_state *);
+ static int print_trampoline (SCM, SCM, scm_print_state *);
+
+ // type_p_name_ can be overriden in the Super class with a static
+ // const char [] string. This requires both a declaration in the
+ // class as well as a single instantiation outside. Using a
+ // template specialization for supplying a different string name
+ // right in Smob_base<Super> itself seems tempting, but the C++
+ // rules would then require a specialization declaration at the
+ // class definition site as well as a specialization instantiation
+ // in a single compilation unit. That requires just as much source
+ // code maintenance while being harder to understand and quite
+ // trickier in its failure symptoms when things go wrong. So we
+ // just use a static zero as "not here" indication.
+ static const int type_p_name_ = 0;
+
+ // LY_DECLARE_SMOB_PROC is used in the Super class definition for
+ // making a smob callable like a function. Declaration has to be
+ // public. It may be either be completed with a semicolon in which
+ // case a definition of the member function smob_proc has to be done
+ // outside of the class body, or the semicolon is left off and an
+ // inline function body is added immediately below. It would be
+ // nice if this were a non-static member function but it would seem
+ // tricky to do the required trampolining for unsmobbing the first
+ // argument of the callback and using it as a this pointer.
+#define LY_DECLARE_SMOB_PROC(REQ, OPT, VAR, ARGLIST) \
+ static const int smob_proc_signature_ = ((REQ)<<8)|((OPT)<<4)|(VAR); \
+ static SCM smob_proc ARGLIST
+
+ // a separate LY_DEFINE_SMOB_PROC seems sort of pointless as it
+ // would just result in SCM CLASS::smob_proc ARGLIST
+ //
+ // The default case without function functionality is recognized by
+ // smob_proc_signature being -1.
+ static const int smob_proc = 0;
+ static const int smob_proc_signature_ = -1;
+
+public:
+ static bool is_smob (SCM s)
+ {
+ return SCM_SMOB_PREDICATE (smob_tag (), s);
+ }
+ static SCM smob_p (SCM s)
+ {
+ return is_smob (s) ? SCM_BOOL_T : SCM_BOOL_F;
+ }
+ static Super *unsmob (SCM s)
+ {
+ return is_smob (s) ? Super::unchecked_unsmob (s) : 0;