+
+%
+% three part study by John Gr/over
+@TechReport{grover89-symbols,
+ author = {John Gr\/over},
+ title = {A computer-oriented description of Music Notation. Part I. The Symbol Inventory},
+ institution = {Department of informatics, University of Oslo},
+ year = 1989,
+ number = 133,
+
+note = {The goal of this series of reports is a full description of
+music formatting. As these largely depend on parameters of fonts, it
+starts with a verbose description of music symbols.
+
+ The subject is treated backwards: from general rules of typesetting
+the author tries to extract dimensions for characters, whereas the
+rules of typesetting (in a particular font) follow from the dimensions
+of the symbols. His symbols do not match (the stringent) constraints
+formulated by eg. \cite{wanske}} }
+
+@TechReport{grover89-twovoices,
+ author = {John Gr\/over},
+ title = {A computer-oriented description of Music Notation. Part II: Two Voice Sharing a Staff, Leger Line Rules, Dot Positioning},
+
+ institution = {Department of informatics, University of Oslo},
+ year = 1989,
+ number = 134,
+
+ note = {A lot rules for what is in the title are formulated. The
+descriptions are long and verbose. The verbosity shows that
+formulating specific rules is not the proper way to approach the
+problem. Instead, the formulated rules should follow from more
+general rules, similar to\cite{parrish87-simultaneities}},
+}
+
+@TechReport{grover89-accidentals,
+ author = {John Gr\/over},
+ title = {A computer-oriented description of Music Notation. Part III: Accidental Positioning},
+ institution = {Department of informatics, University of Oslo},
+ year = 1989,
+ number = 135,
+
+note = {Placement of accidentals crystallised in an enormous set of
+rules. Same remarks as for \cite{grover89-twovoices} applies} }
+
+
+@PhdThesis{mueller90:_inter_bearb_musik,
+ author = {Giovanni M\"uller},
+ title = {Interaktive Bearbeitung konventioneller Musiknotation},
+ school = {Eidgen\"ossischen Technischen Hochschule Z\"urich},
+ year = 1990,
+
+note = {This is about engraver-quality typesetting with computers. It
+accepts the axiom that notation is too difficult to generate
+automatically. The result is that a notation program should be a
+WYSIWYG editor that allows one to tweak everything.
+}
+
+}
+
+
+
+
+