add placenta post
authorDon Armstrong <don@donarmstrong.com>
Fri, 12 May 2017 20:20:29 +0000 (13:20 -0700)
committerDon Armstrong <don@donarmstrong.com>
Fri, 12 May 2017 20:20:29 +0000 (13:20 -0700)
posts/placenta_viviparous_paper.mdwn [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/posts/placenta_viviparous_paper.mdwn b/posts/placenta_viviparous_paper.mdwn
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..dd55d38
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+[[!meta title="Core Transcriptome of Mammalian Placentas"]]
+
+Our
+[paper which describes the components of the placenta transcriptome which are conserved among all placental mammals](http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143400417302369) in
+*Placenta* just came out today. More importantly than the results and
+the text of the paper, though, is the fact that all of the code and
+results of this paper, from the very first work I did two years ago to
+its publication today is present in git, and (in theory) reproducible.
+
+You can see where our paper was rejected from
+*[Genome Biology](https://github.com/uiuc-cgm/placenta-viviparous/tree/genome_biology_submission_4202016)*
+and
+*[Genes and development](https://github.com/uiuc-cgm/placenta-viviparous/tree/genes_dev_submission)*
+radically refocused before submission to
+*[Placenta](https://github.com/uiuc-cgm/placenta-viviparous/compare/genes_dev_submission...master#diff-dfaf04b448930bc40fe8b2907f2c7223)*.
+But more importantly, you can know where every single result which is
+mentioned in the paper came from, the precise code to generate it, and
+how we came to the final paper which was published. [And you've also
+got all of the hooks to branch off from our analysis to do your own
+analysis based on our data!]
+
+This is what open, reproducible science should look like.
+
+[[!tag biology placenta openscience]]