From 03f2d81f7287d765bb1835bad654507167e2c413 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf8?q?Janek=20Warcho=C5=82?= Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:38:37 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] shortening of downstem 8th flag This was discussed here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-03/msg00128.html Not many people gave their opinions; Carl prefers not changing this, but he doesn't feel strongly about it, Werner is not sure, but feels a bit more like shortening the flag, Mike agrees to make the change. My opinion is that it should be changed. --- mf/feta-flags.mf | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/mf/feta-flags.mf b/mf/feta-flags.mf index 95cedb1a82..68a39a7416 100644 --- a/mf/feta-flags.mf +++ b/mf/feta-flags.mf @@ -312,12 +312,12 @@ fet_beginchar ("8th (down)", "d3"); save flagspace, total_depth, flag_count; flag_count = 1; - total_depth# = 2.85 staff_space#; + total_depth# = 2.75 staff_space#; flare = staff_space; flagspace# = .9 staff_space#; - hip_depth_ratio = .72; + hip_depth_ratio = .74; hip_width# = downflag_width# - hip_thickness# / 2; - foot_width_ratio = .8; + foot_width_ratio = .85; (flag_count - 1) * flagspace# + foot_depth# = total_depth#; -- 2.39.2