Doc:NR Pitches: clarify simultaneous accidentals

diff --git a/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely b/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
index c6eb68c16d07fa964bfa360fb1b3df6947537109..0db01c8bde5c920d332110d69302589e87cffb24 100644 (file)
--- a/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
+++ b/Documentation/notation/pitches.itely
@@ -2337,15 +2337,11 @@ Internals Reference:
 
 @knownissues
 
-Simultaneous notes are considered to be entered in sequential
-mode.  This means that in a chord the accidentals are typeset as
-if the notes in the chord happen one at a time, in the order in
-which they appear in the input file.  This is a problem when
-accidentals in a chord depend on each other, which does not happen
-for the default accidental style.  The problem can be solved by
-manually inserting@tie{}@code{!} and@tie{}@code{?} for the
-problematic notes.
-
+Simultaneous notes are not considered in the automatic
+determination of accidentals; only previous notes and the key
+signature are considered.  Forcing accidentals with@tie{}@code{!}
+or@tie{}@code{?} may be required when the same note name occurs
+simultaneously with different alterations, as in @samp{<f! fis!>}.
 
 Cautionary cancellation of accidentals is done by looking at previous measure.
 However, in the @code{\alternative} block following a @code{\repeat volta N}

diff --git a/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely b/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely
index a75e5182f53cc749893f7b6f69974826d6adbc23..c8e808fae1e21cf92bfd840b3c80a35f60dab79d 100644 (file)
--- a/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely
+++ b/Documentation/notation/simultaneous.itely
@@ -104,11 +104,30 @@ Learning Manual:
 Notation Reference:
 @ref{Chord notation},
 @ref{Articulations and ornamentations},
-@ref{Relative octave entry}.
+@ref{Relative octave entry}
+@ref{Multiple voices}.
 
 Snippets:
 @rlsr{Simultaneous notes}.
 
+@knownissues
+Chords containing more than two pitches within a staff space,
+such as @samp{<e f! fis!>}, create overlapping noteheads.
+Depending on the situation, better representations might involve
+
+@itemize
+@item
+temporary use of @ref{Multiple voices},
+@samp{<< f! \\ <e fis!> >>},
+
+@item
+enharmonic transcription of one or more pitches,
+@samp{<e f ges>}, or
+
+@item
+@ref{Clusters}.
+
+@end itemize
 
 @node Chord repetition
 @unnumberedsubsubsec Chord repetition
@@ -730,20 +749,13 @@ Internals Reference:
 @rinternals{RestCollision}.
 
 
-@knownissues
-
 @ignore
+@knownissues
 @c TODO investigate! Sometimes it works, sometimes not. --FV
 The requirements for successfully merging different note heads that
 are at the same time differently dotted are not clear.
 @end ignore
 
-There is no support for chords where the same note occurs with
-different accidentals in the same chord.  In this case, it is
-recommended to use enharmonic transcription, or to use special
-cluster notation (see @ref{Clusters}).
-
-
 @node Automatic part combining
 @unnumberedsubsubsec Automatic part combining