@itemize
@item
-September 2009
-
-The German LinuxUser magazine wrote an
-@uref{http://www.linux-community.de/Internal/Artikel/Print-Artikel/LinuxUser/2009/10/Digitaler-Notenschluessel,
-article about LilyPond}.
-
-
-@item
-February 2008
-
-In @uref{http://www.musicbyandrew.ca/finale-lilypond-1.html,
-articles on his personal site}, Andrew Hawryluk compares Finale
-and LilyPond in general terms, and evaluates engraving
-capabilities of both pieces of software in detail. The second
-article is an instructive analysis of engraving issues in
-Rachmaninoff's Piano Prelude No. 6, including comparisons with a
-hand-engraved reference edition.
-
-@item
-June 2006
-
-@uref{http://distrowatch.com,DistroWatch} awards LilyPond and
-@uref{http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20060605,writes}
-@qq{Ladies and Gentleman, we are pleased to announce that, based
-on readers' requests, the DistroWatch May 2006 donation has been
-awarded to LilyPond (@euro{}190.00) and Lua (US$250.00).}
-
-@item
-December 2005
-
-@uref{http://linuxjournal.com,Linux Journal} publishes an article
-titled @uref{http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8364, Make
-Stunning Schenker Graphs with GNU LilyPond}. It is an in-depth
-but hands-on feature article with crisp LilyPond graphics. Author
-Kris Shaffer remarks @qq{GNU LilyPond generates beautiful graphics
-that make commercial alternatives seem second-rate.}
-
-@item
-August 20, 2005
-
-The Belgian newspaper De Standaard investigates what drives Free
-Software authors in an article titled
-@uref{http://www.standaard.be/Artikel/Detail.aspx?artikelId=G42H5GD6,
-Delen van KENNIS zonder WINSTBEJAG} (Non-profit sharing of
-knowlegde) in its @q{DS2 bijlage}. LilyPond is used as an example
-and the article is interspersed with quotes from an email
-interview with Jan Nieuwenhuizen. This marks LilyPond's first
-appearance in mainstream printed press.
-
-@item
-June 2005
-
-A French article on the LilyPond 2.6 release appeared on
-@uref{http://linuxfr.org/2005/06/27/19210.html, linuxfr.org}.
-
-@item
-October 2004
-
-The editors of Computer!Totaal, a Dutch computer magazine,
-@uref{http://lilypond.org/web/images/computer-totaal.jpeg,
-describe LilyPond} in the October 2004 issue as: @qq{Wonderful
-free (open source) software [..] The sheet music produced by
-LilyPond is exceptionally pretty [..] a very powerful system that
-can do almost anything.}
-
-@item
-July, August 2004
-
-Dave Phillips wrote an introductory article for
-@uref{http://linuxjournal.com,Linux Journal}: At
-the sounding edge: LilyPond, parts
-@uref{http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7657, one} and
-@uref{http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7719, two}.
-
-@item
-March 2004
-
-Chris Cannam
-@uref{http://www.all-day-breakfast.com/cannam/linux-musician/lilypond.html,interviewed}
-Han-Wen Nienhuys and Jan Nieuwenhuizen on linuxmusician.com
-(original site defunct). This interview was also reviewed in a
-@uref{http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/13/2054227&tid=,
-slashdot story}.
-
-@item
-February 2004
-
-Jazz singer Gail Selkirk writes about
-@uref{http://www.songbirdofswing.com/editorial_page/lilypond/,
-Diving into LilyPond}. @qq{... you can make lead sheets or full
-orchestral parts, and the results can be stunning.}
-@uref{http://www.computermusic.co.uk/, Computer Music Special},
-issue CMS06.
+null
@end itemize
@ref{Productions}: Real-life use of LilyPond.
@item
-@ref{Testimonials}: What do people say?
+@ref{Reviews}: What do people say?
@end itemize
@divEnd
* Freedom:: Freedom and the GPL.
* Background:: Computational aesthetics.
* Productions:: Real-life use of LilyPond.
-* Testimonials:: What do people say about it?
+* Reviews:: What do people say about it?
* Text input:: You write music as text?!
* Easier editing:: Other ways of working with LilyPond.
@end menu
@divClass{column-center-bottom}
@subheading Where now?
-Still not convinced? Read some of our users' @ref{Testimonials}.
+Still not convinced? Read some of our users' @ref{Reviews}.
If you've already decided to try LilyPond, first read about our
@ref{Text input}.
@divEnd
@c TRANSLATORS, so far it's mostly from
@c http://lilypond.org/web/switch/testimonials
-@node Testimonials
-@unnumberedsec Testimonials
+@node Reviews
+@unnumberedsec Reviews
+
+@divClass{column-left-top}
+@subheading Published articles
+
+@divClass{keep-bullets}
+@itemize
+
+@item
+September 2009
+
+The German LinuxUser magazine wrote an
+@uref{http://www.linux-community.de/Internal/Artikel/Print-Artikel/LinuxUser/2009/10/Digitaler-Notenschluessel,
+article about LilyPond}.
+
+
+@item
+February 2008
+
+In @uref{http://www.musicbyandrew.ca/finale-lilypond-1.html,
+articles on his personal site}, Andrew Hawryluk compares Finale
+and LilyPond in general terms, and evaluates engraving
+capabilities of both pieces of software in detail. The second
+article is an instructive analysis of engraving issues in
+Rachmaninoff's Piano Prelude No. 6, including comparisons with a
+hand-engraved reference edition.
+
+@item
+June 2006
+
+@uref{http://distrowatch.com,DistroWatch} awards LilyPond and
+@uref{http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20060605,writes}
+@qq{Ladies and Gentleman, we are pleased to announce that, based
+on readers' requests, the DistroWatch May 2006 donation has been
+awarded to LilyPond (@euro{}190.00) and Lua (US$250.00).}
+
+@item
+December 2005
+
+@uref{http://linuxjournal.com,Linux Journal} publishes an article
+titled @uref{http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8364, Make
+Stunning Schenker Graphs with GNU LilyPond}. It is an in-depth
+but hands-on feature article with crisp LilyPond graphics. Author
+Kris Shaffer remarks @qq{GNU LilyPond generates beautiful graphics
+that make commercial alternatives seem second-rate.}
+
+@item
+August 20, 2005
+
+The Belgian newspaper De Standaard investigates what drives Free
+Software authors in an article titled
+@uref{http://www.standaard.be/Artikel/Detail.aspx?artikelId=G42H5GD6,
+Delen van KENNIS zonder WINSTBEJAG} (Non-profit sharing of
+knowlegde) in its @q{DS2 bijlage}. LilyPond is used as an example
+and the article is interspersed with quotes from an email
+interview with Jan Nieuwenhuizen. This marks LilyPond's first
+appearance in mainstream printed press.
+
+@item
+June 2005
+
+A French article on the LilyPond 2.6 release appeared on
+@uref{http://linuxfr.org/2005/06/27/19210.html, linuxfr.org}.
+
+@item
+October 2004
+
+The editors of Computer!Totaal, a Dutch computer magazine,
+@uref{http://lilypond.org/web/images/computer-totaal.jpeg,
+describe LilyPond} in the October 2004 issue as: @qq{Wonderful
+free (open source) software [..] The sheet music produced by
+LilyPond is exceptionally pretty [..] a very powerful system that
+can do almost anything.}
+
+@item
+July, August 2004
+
+Dave Phillips wrote an introductory article for
+@uref{http://linuxjournal.com,Linux Journal}: At
+the sounding edge: LilyPond, parts
+@uref{http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7657, one} and
+@uref{http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7719, two}.
+
+@item
+March 2004
+
+Chris Cannam
+@uref{http://www.all-day-breakfast.com/cannam/linux-musician/lilypond.html,interviewed}
+Han-Wen Nienhuys and Jan Nieuwenhuizen on linuxmusician.com
+(original site defunct). This interview was also reviewed in a
+@uref{http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/13/2054227&tid=,
+slashdot story}.
+
+@item
+February 2004
+
+Jazz singer Gail Selkirk writes about
+@uref{http://www.songbirdofswing.com/editorial_page/lilypond/,
+Diving into LilyPond}. @qq{... you can make lead sheets or full
+orchestral parts, and the results can be stunning.}
+@uref{http://www.computermusic.co.uk/, Computer Music Special},
+issue CMS06.
+
+@end itemize
+
+@divEnd
+@divEnd
+
+
+@divClass{column-right-top}
+@subheading User testimonials
@divClass{testimonial-item}
@imageFloat{carter-brey,jpg, right}
potential.}
@divEnd
+@divEnd
@divClass{column-center-bottom}
@subheading Where now?
graphical score. For more information, see @ref{Easier editing}.
+
@divClass{column-center-bottom}
@subheading Where now?
faster than with a piano keyboard or mouse+GUI! Perhaps you would
like to review the @ref{Features}, @ref{Examples}, or the
@ref{Freedom} that LilyPond provides, or read about users'
-@ref{Productions} and @ref{Testimonials}. In addition, our
+@ref{Productions} and @ref{Reviews}. In addition, our
approach to the computational aesthetics of classical engraving is
explained in our @ref{Background}.