From 618e8f1562577ce24f2bdf3755fdccb860e9b7e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Don Armstrong Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2017 13:06:35 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] remove omer points and references --- omer_points.txt | 28 ---------------------------- references.bib | 1 - 2 files changed, 29 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 omer_points.txt delete mode 120000 references.bib diff --git a/omer_points.txt b/omer_points.txt deleted file mode 100644 index d5ed105..0000000 --- a/omer_points.txt +++ /dev/null @@ -1,28 +0,0 @@ - - -Points for Pap318 comparing R-GARD to A-GARD - -0. A main goal is to compare the two abovementioned GARD models and point -out similarities and differences. We note the constraints on such a -comparison, as the models are inherently different in some respects. But a -later part of the paper will also deal with analyses and properties of R- -GARD irrespective of such comparison. - -1. To better compare R-GARD with A- GARD, IL will generate A-GARD carpets -using Euclidean distance instead of the dot product (H), which we currently -use. We will also compare internally the difference between these two -metrics when applied to the same data. - -2. We will also calculate the compotype counts of A-GARD with kmeans -clustering by using Euclidean distance instead of dot product. We should -check how this change affects the resulting number of compotypes. If for -some reason this does not work easily, we will try a more phenomenological -comparison. - -3. Choose carpets from R-Gard results for us to compare with similar -carpets from A-GARD. These carpets should exhibit repeating compotypes, -drift, and composomes. - -4. Calculate and display statistics to emphasize the dependence of various -results on the parameters of R-GARD. Example: number of compotypes -dependency on split size. diff --git a/references.bib b/references.bib deleted file mode 120000 index 13eef8b..0000000 --- a/references.bib +++ /dev/null @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -../ool_paper_2010/references.bib \ No newline at end of file -- 2.39.2