From 982ebcf0e294afee8456ccc774468e3108447a85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Don Armstrong Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 14:49:23 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] clarify deletion review --- posts/wikipedia_deletion.mdwn | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/posts/wikipedia_deletion.mdwn b/posts/wikipedia_deletion.mdwn index 0543af3..ba03f1d 100644 --- a/posts/wikipedia_deletion.mdwn +++ b/posts/wikipedia_deletion.mdwn @@ -21,11 +21,12 @@ confusion about the copyright on the image, as contains Apache::Gallery's copyright. I didn't notice that during the 7 day deletion review period because I rarely log into Wikipedia. -A few days ago, I noticed, at asked for a +A few days ago, I noticed the deletion and asked for a [Deletion Review](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review). I assumed that my explanation that the copyright notice was for -Apache::Gallery would be understood, and that at least the original -reason for the deletion would be seen to be invalid. Instead, during +Apache::Gallery would be understood (or at least believed), and that +at least the original reason for the deletion would be seen to be +invalid. Instead, during [the process](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2012_June_26#File:Boojum_tree_ucr_botanical_garden.jpg) I was questioned as to whether I actually took the picture, why I used GPLv2+ for the pictures, whether I was claiming other people's images, -- 2.39.2