From f8be0477d1df2f519204cdf3f674f7b803fce3cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ansgar Burchardt <ansgar@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:12:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Improve wording of rejection a bit more.
Many version checks fail because the uploaded version is identical to the one
already present. Make the message correct for that case as well.
---
daklib/checks.py | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/daklib/checks.py b/daklib/checks.py
index 0a22dde8..fc3bb22f 100644
--- a/daklib/checks.py
+++ b/daklib/checks.py
@@ -719,7 +719,7 @@ class VersionCheck(Check):
if v is not None and not op(version_compare(source_version, v)):
raise Reject("Version check failed:\n"
"Your upload included the source package {0}, version {1},\n"
- "however {3} already has the {4} version {2}.\n"
+ "however {3} already has version {2}.\n"
"Uploads to {5} must have a {4} version than present in {3}."
.format(source_name, source_version, v, other_suite.suite_name, op_name, suite.suite_name))
@@ -731,7 +731,7 @@ class VersionCheck(Check):
if v is not None and not op(version_compare(binary_version, v)):
raise Reject("Version check failed:\n"
"Your upload included the binary package {0}, version {1}, for {2},\n"
- "however {4} already has the {5} version {3}.\n"
+ "however {4} already has version {3}.\n"
"Uploads to {6} must have a {5} version than present in {4}."
.format(binary_name, binary_version, architecture, v, other_suite.suite_name, op_name, suite.suite_name))
--
2.39.5