From f6bcecccc496f569abf5f6fc128dc8dae420af9a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:11:15 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] Wording fixes for architecture restriction clarification

Fix the wrong version number in the explanation text (thanks Emilio
Pozuelo Monfort) and potentially confusing wording (thanks Don
Armstrong).
---
 policy.sgml | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
index 120fc3a..1b0751f 100644
--- a/policy.sgml
+++ b/policy.sgml
@@ -4188,16 +4188,16 @@ Build-Depends-Indep: texinfo
 Build-Depends: kernel-headers-2.2.10 [!hurd-i386],
   hurd-dev [hurd-i386], gnumach-dev [hurd-i386]
 	  </example>
-	  requires <tt>kernel-headers-2.2.0</tt> on all architectures
+	  requires <tt>kernel-headers-2.2.10</tt> on all architectures
 	  other than hurd-i386 and requires <tt>hurd-dev</tt> and
 	  <tt>gnumach-dev</tt> only on hurd-i386.
 	</p>
 
 	<p>
 	  If the architecture-restricted dependency is part of a set of
-	  alternatives using <tt>|</tt>, that branch of the alternative is
-	  ignored completely on architectures that do not match the
-	  restriction.  For example:
+	  alternatives using <tt>|</tt>, that alternative is ignored
+	  completely on architectures that do not match the restriction.
+	  For example:
 	  <example compact="compact">
 Build-Depends: foo [!i386] | bar [!amd64]
 	  </example>
-- 
2.39.5