From e5e92529a4d096725c1387bf5d09e76704e8a18f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Polesky Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 07:35:45 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Doc: community.itexi nits. --- Documentation/web/community.itexi | 33 ++++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/web/community.itexi b/Documentation/web/community.itexi index 24ef2e860a..d2038200e7 100644 --- a/Documentation/web/community.itexi +++ b/Documentation/web/community.itexi @@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ September 2009 The German LinuxUser magazine wrote an @uref{http://www.linux-community.de/Internal/Artikel/Print-Artikel/LinuxUser/2009/10/Digitaler-Notenschluessel, -article about lilypond}. +article about LilyPond}. @item @@ -891,29 +891,30 @@ February 2008 In @uref{http://www.musicbyandrew.ca/finale-lilypond-1.html, articles on his personal site}, Andrew Hawryluk compares Finale -and LilyPond in general terms, and evaluates in detail engraving -capabilities of both pieces of software. The second article is an -instructive analysis of Rachmaninoff's Piano Prelude 6 engraving, -including comparisons with a reference hand-engraved edition. +and LilyPond in general terms, and evaluates engraving +capabilities of both pieces of software in detail. The second +article is an instructive analysis of engraving issues in +Rachmaninoff's Piano Prelude No. 6, including comparisons with a +hand-engraved reference edition. @item June 2006 -@uref{http://distrowatch.com,DistroWatch} awards LilyPond and writes +@uref{http://distrowatch.com,DistroWatch} awards LilyPond and @uref{http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20060605,writes} @qq{Ladies and Gentleman, we are pleased to announce that, based on readers' requests, the DistroWatch May 2006 donation has been -awarded to LilyPond (@euro{} 190.00) and Lua (US$250.00).} +awarded to LilyPond (@euro{}190.00) and Lua (US$250.00).} @item December 2005 -@uref{http://linuxjournal.com,Linux Journal} publishes an article titled -@uref{http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8364, Make Stunning -Schenker Graphs with GNU LilyPond}. It is a in-depth but hands-on -feature article with crisp LilyPond graphics. Author Kris Shaffer -remarks “GNU Lilypond generates beautiful graphics that make -commercial alternatives seem second-rate.” +@uref{http://linuxjournal.com,Linux Journal} publishes an article +titled @uref{http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8364, Make +Stunning Schenker Graphs with GNU LilyPond}. It is an in-depth +but hands-on feature article with crisp LilyPond graphics. Author +Kris Shaffer remarks @qq{GNU Lilypond generates beautiful graphics +that make commercial alternatives seem second-rate.} @item August 20, 2005 @@ -922,9 +923,9 @@ The Belgian newspaper De Standaard investigates what drives Free Software authors in an article titled @uref{http://www.standaard.be/Artikel/Detail.aspx?artikelId=G42H5GD6, Delen van KENNIS zonder WINSTBEJAG} (Non-profit sharing of -knowlegde) in its `DS2 bijlage'. LilyPond is used as an example -and the article is interspersed with quotes from an `email -interview' with Jan Nieuwenhuizen. This marks LilyPond's first +knowlegde) in its @q{DS2 bijlage}. LilyPond is used as an example +and the article is interspersed with quotes from an email +interview with Jan Nieuwenhuizen. This marks LilyPond's first appearance in mainstream printed press. @item -- 2.39.5