From e268e43ce0fd9079de078dca6c0547e27e382323 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Jackson Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:54:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] 681634 wording improvement from private email --- .../rra-draft-ijackson | 17 +++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/681834_gnome_recommends_networkmanager/rra-draft-ijackson b/681834_gnome_recommends_networkmanager/rra-draft-ijackson index b284c8c..36e77d3 100644 --- a/681834_gnome_recommends_networkmanager/rra-draft-ijackson +++ b/681834_gnome_recommends_networkmanager/rra-draft-ijackson @@ -20,14 +20,15 @@ deeper or tighter integration of network-manager into GNOME than was the case in squeeze. - 4. If matters are left as they currently stand, users who have the gnome - metapackages installed but do not have network-manager installed will, - in the process of upgrading from squeeze to wheezy (either due to an - explicit decision to remove it or an implicit decision to not install - it by disabling automatic installation of Recommends), end up - installing network-manager on systems where it is currently not - installed. It will also no longer be possible for users to install - GNOME metapackages in wheezy without installing network-manager. + 4. If matters are left as they currently stand, users who have the + gnome metapackages installed but do not have network-manager + installed (either due to an explicit decision to remove it or an + implicit decision to not install it by disabling automatic + installation of Recommends) will, in the process of upgrading from + squeeze to wheezy, end up installing network-manager on systems + where it is currently not installed. It will also no longer be + possible for users to install GNOME metapackages in wheezy without + installing network-manager. 5. For most applications and components, the only drawback of this would be some additional disk space usage, since the application, despite -- 2.39.5