From a525b49f6801679eedf7108b7d1bbb7b56ab6a63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Graham Percival Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 23:37:17 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Web: rename/move to create Intro->Reviews 1) old Introduction-> Testimonials ==> the right-hand div in Introduction->Reviews. 2) old Community->Publications "what others wrote" ==> left-hand div in Introduction->Reviews. 3) global "s/Testimonials/Reviews/g" in introduction.itely. --- Documentation/web/community.itexi | 94 +------------------- Documentation/web/introduction.itexi | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/web/community.itexi b/Documentation/web/community.itexi index 3a70ec0c75..86a9b6d572 100644 --- a/Documentation/web/community.itexi +++ b/Documentation/web/community.itexi @@ -777,99 +777,7 @@ on Musical Informatics (XIV CIM 2003), Firenze, Italy, May 2003. @itemize @item -September 2009 - -The German LinuxUser magazine wrote an -@uref{http://www.linux-community.de/Internal/Artikel/Print-Artikel/LinuxUser/2009/10/Digitaler-Notenschluessel, -article about LilyPond}. - - -@item -February 2008 - -In @uref{http://www.musicbyandrew.ca/finale-lilypond-1.html, -articles on his personal site}, Andrew Hawryluk compares Finale -and LilyPond in general terms, and evaluates engraving -capabilities of both pieces of software in detail. The second -article is an instructive analysis of engraving issues in -Rachmaninoff's Piano Prelude No. 6, including comparisons with a -hand-engraved reference edition. - -@item -June 2006 - -@uref{http://distrowatch.com,DistroWatch} awards LilyPond and -@uref{http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20060605,writes} -@qq{Ladies and Gentleman, we are pleased to announce that, based -on readers' requests, the DistroWatch May 2006 donation has been -awarded to LilyPond (@euro{}190.00) and Lua (US$250.00).} - -@item -December 2005 - -@uref{http://linuxjournal.com,Linux Journal} publishes an article -titled @uref{http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8364, Make -Stunning Schenker Graphs with GNU LilyPond}. It is an in-depth -but hands-on feature article with crisp LilyPond graphics. Author -Kris Shaffer remarks @qq{GNU LilyPond generates beautiful graphics -that make commercial alternatives seem second-rate.} - -@item -August 20, 2005 - -The Belgian newspaper De Standaard investigates what drives Free -Software authors in an article titled -@uref{http://www.standaard.be/Artikel/Detail.aspx?artikelId=G42H5GD6, -Delen van KENNIS zonder WINSTBEJAG} (Non-profit sharing of -knowlegde) in its @q{DS2 bijlage}. LilyPond is used as an example -and the article is interspersed with quotes from an email -interview with Jan Nieuwenhuizen. This marks LilyPond's first -appearance in mainstream printed press. - -@item -June 2005 - -A French article on the LilyPond 2.6 release appeared on -@uref{http://linuxfr.org/2005/06/27/19210.html, linuxfr.org}. - -@item -October 2004 - -The editors of Computer!Totaal, a Dutch computer magazine, -@uref{http://lilypond.org/web/images/computer-totaal.jpeg, -describe LilyPond} in the October 2004 issue as: @qq{Wonderful -free (open source) software [..] The sheet music produced by -LilyPond is exceptionally pretty [..] a very powerful system that -can do almost anything.} - -@item -July, August 2004 - -Dave Phillips wrote an introductory article for -@uref{http://linuxjournal.com,Linux Journal}: At -the sounding edge: LilyPond, parts -@uref{http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7657, one} and -@uref{http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7719, two}. - -@item -March 2004 - -Chris Cannam -@uref{http://www.all-day-breakfast.com/cannam/linux-musician/lilypond.html,interviewed} -Han-Wen Nienhuys and Jan Nieuwenhuizen on linuxmusician.com -(original site defunct). This interview was also reviewed in a -@uref{http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/13/2054227&tid=, -slashdot story}. - -@item -February 2004 - -Jazz singer Gail Selkirk writes about -@uref{http://www.songbirdofswing.com/editorial_page/lilypond/, -Diving into LilyPond}. @qq{... you can make lead sheets or full -orchestral parts, and the results can be stunning.} -@uref{http://www.computermusic.co.uk/, Computer Music Special}, -issue CMS06. +null @end itemize diff --git a/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi b/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi index 99ffba6772..e49ae7be03 100644 --- a/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi +++ b/Documentation/web/introduction.itexi @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ traditions of classical music engraving. @ref{Productions}: Real-life use of LilyPond. @item -@ref{Testimonials}: What do people say? +@ref{Reviews}: What do people say? @end itemize @divEnd @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ traditions of classical music engraving. * Freedom:: Freedom and the GPL. * Background:: Computational aesthetics. * Productions:: Real-life use of LilyPond. -* Testimonials:: What do people say about it? +* Reviews:: What do people say about it? * Text input:: You write music as text?! * Easier editing:: Other ways of working with LilyPond. @end menu @@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ lovers. @divClass{column-center-bottom} @subheading Where now? -Still not convinced? Read some of our users' @ref{Testimonials}. +Still not convinced? Read some of our users' @ref{Reviews}. If you've already decided to try LilyPond, first read about our @ref{Text input}. @divEnd @@ -570,8 +570,118 @@ If you've already decided to try LilyPond, first read about our @c TRANSLATORS, so far it's mostly from @c http://lilypond.org/web/switch/testimonials -@node Testimonials -@unnumberedsec Testimonials +@node Reviews +@unnumberedsec Reviews + +@divClass{column-left-top} +@subheading Published articles + +@divClass{keep-bullets} +@itemize + +@item +September 2009 + +The German LinuxUser magazine wrote an +@uref{http://www.linux-community.de/Internal/Artikel/Print-Artikel/LinuxUser/2009/10/Digitaler-Notenschluessel, +article about LilyPond}. + + +@item +February 2008 + +In @uref{http://www.musicbyandrew.ca/finale-lilypond-1.html, +articles on his personal site}, Andrew Hawryluk compares Finale +and LilyPond in general terms, and evaluates engraving +capabilities of both pieces of software in detail. The second +article is an instructive analysis of engraving issues in +Rachmaninoff's Piano Prelude No. 6, including comparisons with a +hand-engraved reference edition. + +@item +June 2006 + +@uref{http://distrowatch.com,DistroWatch} awards LilyPond and +@uref{http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20060605,writes} +@qq{Ladies and Gentleman, we are pleased to announce that, based +on readers' requests, the DistroWatch May 2006 donation has been +awarded to LilyPond (@euro{}190.00) and Lua (US$250.00).} + +@item +December 2005 + +@uref{http://linuxjournal.com,Linux Journal} publishes an article +titled @uref{http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8364, Make +Stunning Schenker Graphs with GNU LilyPond}. It is an in-depth +but hands-on feature article with crisp LilyPond graphics. Author +Kris Shaffer remarks @qq{GNU LilyPond generates beautiful graphics +that make commercial alternatives seem second-rate.} + +@item +August 20, 2005 + +The Belgian newspaper De Standaard investigates what drives Free +Software authors in an article titled +@uref{http://www.standaard.be/Artikel/Detail.aspx?artikelId=G42H5GD6, +Delen van KENNIS zonder WINSTBEJAG} (Non-profit sharing of +knowlegde) in its @q{DS2 bijlage}. LilyPond is used as an example +and the article is interspersed with quotes from an email +interview with Jan Nieuwenhuizen. This marks LilyPond's first +appearance in mainstream printed press. + +@item +June 2005 + +A French article on the LilyPond 2.6 release appeared on +@uref{http://linuxfr.org/2005/06/27/19210.html, linuxfr.org}. + +@item +October 2004 + +The editors of Computer!Totaal, a Dutch computer magazine, +@uref{http://lilypond.org/web/images/computer-totaal.jpeg, +describe LilyPond} in the October 2004 issue as: @qq{Wonderful +free (open source) software [..] The sheet music produced by +LilyPond is exceptionally pretty [..] a very powerful system that +can do almost anything.} + +@item +July, August 2004 + +Dave Phillips wrote an introductory article for +@uref{http://linuxjournal.com,Linux Journal}: At +the sounding edge: LilyPond, parts +@uref{http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7657, one} and +@uref{http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7719, two}. + +@item +March 2004 + +Chris Cannam +@uref{http://www.all-day-breakfast.com/cannam/linux-musician/lilypond.html,interviewed} +Han-Wen Nienhuys and Jan Nieuwenhuizen on linuxmusician.com +(original site defunct). This interview was also reviewed in a +@uref{http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/13/2054227&tid=, +slashdot story}. + +@item +February 2004 + +Jazz singer Gail Selkirk writes about +@uref{http://www.songbirdofswing.com/editorial_page/lilypond/, +Diving into LilyPond}. @qq{... you can make lead sheets or full +orchestral parts, and the results can be stunning.} +@uref{http://www.computermusic.co.uk/, Computer Music Special}, +issue CMS06. + +@end itemize + +@divEnd +@divEnd + + +@divClass{column-right-top} +@subheading User testimonials @divClass{testimonial-item} @imageFloat{carter-brey,jpg, right} @@ -702,6 +812,7 @@ last year, i was raving to several friends of mine about its potential.} @divEnd +@divEnd @divClass{column-center-bottom} @subheading Where now? @@ -822,6 +933,7 @@ actually provide a GUI which allows direct manipulation of a graphical score. For more information, see @ref{Easier editing}. + @divClass{column-center-bottom} @subheading Where now? @@ -1052,7 +1164,7 @@ users even report that they can enter a full score in LilyPond faster than with a piano keyboard or mouse+GUI! Perhaps you would like to review the @ref{Features}, @ref{Examples}, or the @ref{Freedom} that LilyPond provides, or read about users' -@ref{Productions} and @ref{Testimonials}. In addition, our +@ref{Productions} and @ref{Reviews}. In addition, our approach to the computational aesthetics of classical engraving is explained in our @ref{Background}. -- 2.39.5