From 96b0d3beb3721c7781372ef4de69ab6b0aa08439 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Valentin Villenave Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 14:32:40 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Regtests: typo. I mixed up "quanting" and "quantizing". Sorry. --- input/regression/baerenreiter-sarabande.ly | 2 +- input/regression/beam-concave.ly | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/input/regression/baerenreiter-sarabande.ly b/input/regression/baerenreiter-sarabande.ly index 5a826bc593..f0f2cd4da5 100644 --- a/input/regression/baerenreiter-sarabande.ly +++ b/input/regression/baerenreiter-sarabande.ly @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ include articulation, but it does follows the same beaming and linebreaking as the printed edition. This is done in order to benchmark the quality of the LilyPond output. -As of lilypond 1.5.42, the spacing and beam quantizing is almost +As of lilypond 1.5.42, the spacing and beam quanting is almost identical. There are two tweaks in this file: a line-break was forced before diff --git a/input/regression/beam-concave.ly b/input/regression/beam-concave.ly index 093f30d918..f104b16ef1 100644 --- a/input/regression/beam-concave.ly +++ b/input/regression/beam-concave.ly @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ beam. If an up-beam has high notes on its center stems, then we call it concave. - If a beam is fails a test, the desired slope is printed next to it. + If a beam fails a test, the desired slope is printed next to it. " } -- 2.39.5