From 958b28ecb05b8c21e6e225e1668e7e480f98e66b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Han-Wen Nienhuys Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 19:21:48 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] *** empty log message *** --- Documentation/user/introduction.itely | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/user/introduction.itely b/Documentation/user/introduction.itely index df1d749f82..f368f5300a 100644 --- a/Documentation/user/introduction.itely +++ b/Documentation/user/introduction.itely @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ unpleasant to play from. The images below illustrate the difference between traditional engraving and typical computer output, and the third picture shows how LilyPond mimics the traditional look. The left picture shows a scan -of a flat symbol from a Henle edition published in 2000. The center +of a flat symbol from an edition published in 2000. The center depicts a symbol from a hand-engraved B@"{a}renreiter edition of the same music. The left scan illustrates typical flaws of computer print: the staff lines are thin, the weight of the flat symbol matches @@ -51,7 +51,8 @@ the light lines and it has a straight layout with sharp corners. By contrast, the B@"{a}renreiter flat has a bold, almost voluptuous rounded look. Our flat symbol is designed after, among others, this one. It is rounded, and its weight harmonizes with the thickness of -our staff lines, which are also much thicker than Henle's lines. +our staff lines, which are also much thicker than lines in the +computer edition. @multitable @columnfractions .05 .3 .3 .3 .05 @item @tab -- 2.39.5