From 86fa50596945324d6b5ab95f8fb018ab69a4e633 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Graham Percival Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:30:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] CG: GOP item about regtests. --- Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi | 14 +++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi b/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi index 4f98519e91..e906dc362c 100644 --- a/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi +++ b/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ discussion. @warning{The estimated time required for "prep work", and the following discussion, has been added to each item. At the moment, -there is an estimated 30 hours of prep work and 135 hours of +there is an estimated 30 hours of prep work and 140 hours of discussion.} @itemize @@ -495,6 +495,18 @@ patches, etc etc. (prep: 1 hour. discuss: 5 hours) +@item @strong{When do we add regtests?}: +There is a discrepancy between our stated policy on adding +regtests, and our actual practice in handling bugs and patches. +Clarify. + +There is also a wider question how to organize the regtests, such +as where to put interesting-console-output regtests, including +stuff like lilypond-book and midi2ly in a sensible manner, and +possibly including regtests for currently-broken functionality. + +(prep: 2 hours. discuss: 5 hours) + @end itemize -- 2.39.2