From 70287f1eaba2c60e68058229631a8777a56c4fce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Colin Watson Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:05:11 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] clarify terms --- 717076_libjpeg/cjwatson_draft.txt | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/717076_libjpeg/cjwatson_draft.txt b/717076_libjpeg/cjwatson_draft.txt index 89847ec..375369e 100644 --- a/717076_libjpeg/cjwatson_draft.txt +++ b/717076_libjpeg/cjwatson_draft.txt @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ Whereas: - 1. There is a dispute between Developers about whether libjpeg8 or - libjpeg-turbo should be the default libjpeg implementation in - Debian. The release team does not want to have more than one - libjpeg implementation. + 1. There is a dispute between Developers about whether IJG libjpeg8/9 + (hereafter simply "IJG libjpeg") or libjpeg-turbo should be the + default libjpeg implementation in Debian. The release team does + not want to have more than one libjpeg implementation. - 2. The Debian IJG libjpeg8 maintainer does not see libjpeg-turbo as a + 2. The Debian IJG libjpeg maintainer does not see libjpeg-turbo as a suitable replacement, and notes that it does not implement the full libjpeg8/9 ABI. -- 2.39.5