From 58ab190a8c04782c6a2e349891d57aa3ae503faa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Francisco Vila Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 02:49:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Mark reorder plan for Simultaneous --- Documentation/user/simultaneous.itely | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/user/simultaneous.itely b/Documentation/user/simultaneous.itely index f0cf731f6e..5071270534 100644 --- a/Documentation/user/simultaneous.itely +++ b/Documentation/user/simultaneous.itely @@ -134,6 +134,20 @@ multiple staves. * Writing music in parallel:: @end menu +@ignore FUTURE PLANS. Carl suggested: + +Perhaps it would be clearer if we started with single-staff polyphony +with named and explicitly created voices, along with the \voiceOne +through \voiceFour properties. + +We could then introduce the << \\ >> syntax as a simple way to handle +music where we don't care that temporary voices are created and then +discarded. + +It seems to me to be much easier to go from the full understanding to +the shortcut than the other way around. +@end ignore + @node Single-staff polyphony @unnumberedsubsubsec Single-staff polyphony -- 2.39.5