From 4ca7755e47e3c2a52b866575463321321b957160 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Graham Percival Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 22:28:02 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] CG: add GOP questions about identifiers. --- .../contributor/administration.itexi | 22 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi b/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi index e906dc362c..980c2141fe 100644 --- a/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi +++ b/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi @@ -814,6 +814,28 @@ http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1322 should engravers be pluralized (note_heads_engraver) or not (note_head_engraver) ? +@item +should we allow numbers in identifier names? Issue: +http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1670 + +@item +should we officially allow accented characters? in general, how +do we feel about utf-8 stuff? + +@item +for the sake of completeness/simplicity, what about *disallowing* +the "one-note" form of a music expression? i.e. only allowing +stuff like +@verbatim + \transpose c d { e1 } + \transpose c d << e1 >> +@end verbatim + +and never allowing +@verbatim + \transpose c d e1 +@end verbatim + @end itemize -- 2.39.2