From 4bfa2989fb591e5e955e580b35f2a961998ee4e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Don Armstrong Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:32:59 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] update summary --- .../682010_celt_and_mumble.org | 22 +++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/682010_celt_and_mumble/682010_celt_and_mumble.org b/682010_celt_and_mumble/682010_celt_and_mumble.org index 4311182..4a10f06 100644 --- a/682010_celt_and_mumble/682010_celt_and_mumble.org +++ b/682010_celt_and_mumble/682010_celt_and_mumble.org @@ -1,24 +1,42 @@ * Issue http://bugs.debian.org/682010 http://bugs.debian.org/675971 ** Mumble in unstable/testing currently cannot interact with other clients and servers - + Due to the removal of celt 0.7.1 (?) + + Due to the removal of celt http://bugs.debian.org/676592 + + Mumble dropping speex in unstable and speex not being selected at higher bandwidths + http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675971#51 + Interoperation: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675971#61 * Possible solutions ** Include celt 0.7.1 as a convenience copy + Security Issues with embedded copies + + Mitigated as mumble would have the only copy + Unspecified possible security issues + + Potential remote crasher + -348 is currently this way in testing ** Upload a celt 0.7.1 package + No maintainer desires to deal with this (apparently?) + + Upstream do not wish additional packages to use celt; wish transition to opus + Unspecified possible security issues ** Use speex instead + Server (and clients?) do not select speex as an option unless bandwidth is low + + May be resolved by Thorvald Natvig with a hack ** Use only opus - + Not yet (?) released upstream + + Opus itself released upstream + + Code to enable mumble does not exist in + May not communicate with non-opus clients * Open questions ** Can speex be made to be an option? + + Thorvald thinks so; no patch as of yet (off for a week?) ** Is a convenience copy acceptable, assuming mumble is the only thing with it? + + Possible remote crasher bug is the primary objection to allowing this ** What are the other clients that we want to make sure the mumble servers can communicate with? +|--------------------+----------------------+----------------+-----------+-----------| +| client/server | Deb 1.2.2-6+squeeze1 | Deb 1.2.3-2+b2 | Deb "348" | Deb "349" | +|--------------------+----------------------+----------------+-----------+-----------| +| Deb. Client "348" | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | +| Deb. Client "349" | No | No | Yes | Yes | +| Win. Client 1.2.3a | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | +| Win. Client "361" | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | +| Mac Client 1.2.2 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | +|--------------------+----------------------+----------------+-----------+-----------| +* Resolutions * Involved parties ** Chris.Knadle@coredump.us, Ron , 682010@bugs.debian.org, 675971@bugs.debian.org, Nicos Gollan , Thorvald Natvig -- 2.39.5