From 2e2d7ec04e8e5624da6fd1e9bbb3f34f2545a76b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Graham Percival Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 21:33:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Web: minor formatting fixes to Testimonials. --- Documentation/general/introduction.itexi | 15 +++++++-------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/general/introduction.itexi b/Documentation/general/introduction.itexi index cf8bf86c06..119b4e6fdc 100644 --- a/Documentation/general/introduction.itexi +++ b/Documentation/general/introduction.itexi @@ -567,12 +567,11 @@ look half as sharp as mine!} @imageFloat{orm-finnendahl,jpg, left} @subsubheading @uref{http://icem-www.folkwang-hochschule.de/~finnendahl/, Orm Finnendahl}, professor of Composition, Musikhochschule Freiburg -@qq{Although I don't know [LilyPond] very well yet, I'm *very* -impressed. I used the program to input a motet of Josquin Desprez -in mensural notation and there's no doubt that lilypond outscores -all other notation programs easily concerning speed, ease of use -and look!} -@divEnd +@qq{Although I don't know [LilyPond] very well yet, I'm +@strong{*very} impressed. I used the program to input a motet of +Josquin Desprez in mensural notation and there's no doubt that +lilypond outscores all other notation programs easily concerning +speed, ease of use and look!} @divEnd @divClass{testimonial-item} @@ -596,9 +595,9 @@ work. I've never seen anything approaching the output that I get from Lilypond -- I'm totally confident that my music publishing needs will be fulfilled beyond my expectations using this great application. [..] basically untweaked Lilypond output [..] looks -better than most recent "professional" publications I've compared +better than most recent @qq{professional} publications I've compared it to (q.v., just about any Warner Bros. score, and even many of -the most recent by "the old houses"). [..]} +the most recent by @qq{the old houses}}). [..]} @qq{Beat that, Finale/Sibelius/Igor/whatever!!!} @divEnd -- 2.39.5