From 112f2ea6a53a88c6c224be632469b142864da85a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Graham Percival Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 03:58:00 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Guess what's changing again? :) --- Documentation/user/putting.itely | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/user/putting.itely b/Documentation/user/putting.itely index 40a2f891cf..bfdc88e558 100644 --- a/Documentation/user/putting.itely +++ b/Documentation/user/putting.itely @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ e4^\markup{ \italic ritenuto } g b e @end lilypond That looks better, but it isn't quite big enough. After experimenting -with a few values, I think 2.3 is the best number in this case. However, +with a few values, we think 2.3 is the best number in this case. However, this number is merely the result of experimentation and my personal taste in notation. Try the above example with 2.3... but also try higher (and lower) numbers. Which do you think looks the best? @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ e4^\markup{ \italic ritenuto } g b e With @code{extra-offset}, the first number controls the horizontal movement (left is negative); the second number controls the vertial -movement (up is positive). After a bit of experimenting, I decided +movement (up is positive). After a bit of experimenting, we decided that these values look good @lilypond[quote,fragment,raggedright,verbatim,relative=2] -- 2.39.5