From 065710a701a39280586e4615e768cc73b631c7f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Han-Wen Nienhuys Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 13:53:23 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] more doc strings. --- input/test/broken.ly | 25 ++++--------------------- input/test/grace-end.ly | 12 ++++++------ input/test/knee-sym.ly | 10 +++++++--- 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/input/test/broken.ly b/input/test/broken.ly index 7f27abb51b..83028568d8 100644 --- a/input/test/broken.ly +++ b/input/test/broken.ly @@ -1,14 +1,8 @@ \version "1.7.18" -% TODO: move to regression or remove? -\header{ -%texidoc = "This file tests slurs" -texidoc = "DELETE, or possibly REGRESSION. " +\header{ texidoc = "Broken parts of slurs should show the trend of the +encompassed notes." } - -%% todo: this is very old, still talks about "feta embedded" slurs? - - shortlong = \notes{ c4(c-)( c c | c c c c | @@ -18,29 +12,18 @@ shortlong = \notes{ } broken = \notes\transpose c c'{ - c c c c( - c-) c c c( c c-) c c( - c c c-) c( a'-) a' a' a'() - a' a' a' a'() - c( c c c-) - c( c c f,-) - f,( c c c-) - f,( c c f,-) + a' a' a' a'( } \score{ \notes{ -% \shortlong \broken } \paper{ - indent = 0.0\pt - %for broken! - linewidth= 30.\mm - + raggedright = ##t } } diff --git a/input/test/grace-end.ly b/input/test/grace-end.ly index 93f5b3a1ed..b0909aefcc 100644 --- a/input/test/grace-end.ly +++ b/input/test/grace-end.ly @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ \version "1.7.18" -% I don't see the point. I'll add this to my next round -% of delete'ing, unless Han notices this comment in the -% changelog and deletes it before I ask. :) -gp -\header {texidoc = "DELETE ME " } +\header { -%\header { texidoc="@cindex Grace End -%You can put grace notes after a note. " } + texidoc="@cindex Grace End + Grace notes after the last note do not confuse the timing code." + + +} \score { \context Voice \notes\relative c { diff --git a/input/test/knee-sym.ly b/input/test/knee-sym.ly index 27234c2bd8..c82f968af0 100644 --- a/input/test/knee-sym.ly +++ b/input/test/knee-sym.ly @@ -1,11 +1,15 @@ \version "1.7.18" -% candidate for regression. -gp -\header { texidoc = "REGRESSION or DELETE " } +\header { + + texidoc = "Point-symmetric beams should receive the same + quanting. There is no up/down bias in the quanting code." + +} + \score{ \notes\relative c'{ a8-[ b'' a,, b''] b8-[ a,, b'' a,,] - \stemUp [ b8 \stemDown b''] } \paper{ raggedright = ##t -- 2.39.5