From 022577faab22e5d8b4cadf279a32fe06551f59d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Graham Percival Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 10:46:24 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] CG: add GOP policy question about critical issues. --- Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi | 10 ++++++++++ 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi b/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi index 8dbc9eb68f..077eb15c15 100644 --- a/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi +++ b/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi @@ -485,6 +485,16 @@ required merging and stuff. (prep: 2 hours. discuss: 10 hours) +@item @strong{Precise definition of Critical issues}: +at the moment, a stable release is entirely dependent on the +number of Critical issues, but there's some questions about +precisely what a "Critical issue" should be. We should clarify +this, in conjunction with a general discussion about how often we +want to have stable releases, how permissive we want to be about +patches, etc etc. + +(prep: 1 hour. discuss: 5 hours) + @end itemize -- 2.39.5