From: Didier Raboud Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 19:04:53 +0000 (+0200) Subject: 750135: Capitalize Technical Committee in consistence with previous texts X-Git-Url: https://git.donarmstrong.com/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=d75647145baf90827fae93c5a0e3ccd5e60202a8;p=debian-ctte.git 750135: Capitalize Technical Committee in consistence with previous texts --- diff --git a/750135_aptitude/draft b/750135_aptitude/draft index 92c3d99..7411e29 100644 --- a/750135_aptitude/draft +++ b/750135_aptitude/draft @@ -1,10 +1,10 @@ Background/Rationale (Constitution 6.1(5)): -1. In #750135, the technical committee was asked by Manuel Fernandez Montecelo who should be the maintainer of the Aptitude project. +1. In #750135, the Technical Committee was asked by Manuel Fernandez Montecelo who should be the maintainer of the Aptitude project. He had been actively committing until his commit access was removed by Daniel Hartwig. Manuel and Daniel took over development of Aptitude in 2011 with the support of Christian Perrier, an admin for the Aptitude alioth project. There was friction between Manuel and Daniel, which eventually resulted in Manuel's commit access being revoked by Daniel. -Since then, Daniel has become inactive, and did not comment on the issue when requested by the technical committee. +Since then, Daniel has become inactive, and did not comment on the issue when requested by the Technical Committee. 2. During the discussion of this issue, Christian Perrier proposed that he and Axel Beckert could watch the social aspects of Aptitude development and restore Manuel's commit access. Christian still has administrative rights and believes he has the technical power to implement his proposal. @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ However he wants review from a broader audience before implementing that proposa Advice (Constitution 6.1.5): -1. The technical committee agrees that Christian has the power to implement his proposal and encourages him to do so. +1. The Technical Committee agrees that Christian has the power to implement his proposal and encourages him to do so. 2. The committee agrees that restoring Manuel's committ access is a good step to move Aptitude development forward. Since there is a clear way to accomplish this goal within the existing Aptitude project support that approach.