From: Graham Percival <graham@percival-music.ca>
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 20:01:37 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: CG: reminder about GOP initalization lists.
X-Git-Tag: release/2.15.4-1~1^2
X-Git-Url: https://git.donarmstrong.com/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ae3e4ea50026d383f1db9a7697a0c8b0ef4eab25;hp=-c;p=lilypond.git

CG: reminder about GOP initalization lists.
---

ae3e4ea50026d383f1db9a7697a0c8b0ef4eab25
diff --git a/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi b/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi
index 6d8533107c..da8f48276c 100644
--- a/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi
+++ b/Documentation/contributor/administration.itexi
@@ -513,6 +513,16 @@ suggested in a different proposal), this proposal may become moot.
 
 (prep: 1 hour.  discuss: 5 hours)
 
+@item @strong{initalizer lists}:
+shoudl we use initalizer lists for C++?  AFAIK they make no
+difference for built-in types, but there's some weird case where
+it's more efficient for objects, or something.
+
+Probably not worth making this a weekly thing on its own, but we
+can probably wrap it up with some other code-related questions.
+
+(prep: 15 minutes.  discuss: 3 hours)
+
 @end itemize
 
 @node Policy decisions (finished)