From: Don Armstrong Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 17:29:44 +0000 (-0700) Subject: add 20130530 meeting X-Git-Url: https://git.donarmstrong.com/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=80dac2a7be569e954ea36cd312da912752ad9868;p=debian-ctte.git add 20130530 meeting --- diff --git a/meetings/20130530/debian-ctte.2013-05-30-16.59.log.txt b/meetings/20130530/debian-ctte.2013-05-30-16.59.log.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f87b05e --- /dev/null +++ b/meetings/20130530/debian-ctte.2013-05-30-16.59.log.txt @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ +16:59:31 #startmeeting +16:59:31 Meeting started Thu May 30 16:59:31 2013 UTC. The chair is dondelelcaro. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. +16:59:31 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic. +16:59:36 #topic Who is here? +16:59:38 Don Armstrong +16:59:43 Bdale Garbee +17:00:04 I know rra is probably not going to be here +17:00:14 yup, saw his note +17:00:33 Colin Watson +17:00:43 Steve Langasek +17:00:51 (but possibly only intermittently) +17:01:47 cool +17:01:59 I guess I'll move on to the next topic +17:02:02 #topic Next Meeting? +17:02:04 * aba is here +17:02:31 currently, the next meeting is scheduled for the same time on the 27th of June +17:02:38 does that work for everyone? +17:03:12 looks ok here +17:03:15 should +17:03:18 AFAIK yes +17:03:22 ok, cool +17:03:31 #agreed next meeting to be 27th of June at same time +17:03:41 #topic #688772 Do the changes to NM address the concerns properly? [Bdale+RMs to rule] +17:03:43 27th works for me +17:03:54 I think for this, bdale just needs to ok it +17:04:01 I believe we've now passed the window where this actually matters +17:04:06 I keep forgetting to get around to this +17:04:17 * aba agrees with dondelelcaro +17:04:18 yes, I think so +17:04:41 cool +17:04:44 should we just close it? +17:04:47 sure +17:04:59 Agreed, either it's OK or it's overtaken by events ... +17:05:02 if you close it, that's good enough +17:05:11 working on it +17:05:56 #topic #698556 and #700759 -- don to deal with these two +17:06:12 I've failed, and forgot to deal with these myself; I'll get to them today. +17:06:36 Hm, in what respect is #698556 not dealt with? +17:06:48 cjwatson: I need to e-mail -announce +17:06:53 Ah, OK +17:06:55 at least, I think I haven't done that yet +17:07:06 looks like +17:07:11 #action dondelelcaro to deal with #698556 +17:07:14 #action dondelelcaro to deal with #700759 +17:07:19 * rra gets back earlier than expected from the auto mechanic. +17:07:24 #topic #636783 super-majority conflict; +17:07:43 rra: hopefully less expensively than expected too! ;-) +17:08:10 who wanted to take care of it? +17:08:33 I think last time we had agreed to backburner it until after the release +17:08:38 Thankfully, just a routine service. At least so far, and I'm clinging to my illusions. :) +17:08:46 but this was Diziet's issue +17:08:47 It looks like we're there +17:09:03 (at least, iirc, that was the case) +17:09:46 I think we can ask Diziet to write up a proposal and send it to -ctte, and then start the discussion of it there +17:09:57 does that sound reasonable? +17:10:06 would work for me +17:10:13 sure +17:10:46 #action Diziet to write up a proposal (or start of one) for #636783 (super majority conflcit) +17:10:52 #topic #681419 Depends: foo | foo-nonfree +17:11:02 cjwatson: did Diziet send the review of this to you? +17:11:18 No, I don't think so +17:11:26 ok +17:11:39 If we both make it to the pub last night then I shall prod him there :) +17:11:44 Er. Tonight. +17:11:47 ah, awesome +17:11:50 Apparently I have a time machine. Cool. +17:11:53 heh +17:12:04 If you both make it to the pub last night, you could have him take care of it before this meeting. :) +17:12:21 A fair point and well argued. +17:12:40 #topic #685795 New ctte member +17:12:44 cjwatson: I thought maybe you'd already been to the pub today for a minute there... +17:12:48 heh +17:13:17 so I should probably engage Lucas for a chat about the new member process? +17:13:25 yeah, sounds reasonable +17:13:36 yes. +17:13:55 though technically spoken the first move is ours +17:13:56 I think where things were left is that I was supposed to summarize who said yes in private email to all of you, then we'd make a recommendation, but that kind of stalled while we waited across the DPL transition +17:14:01 right +17:14:23 yeah, once we have an accepted list of nominees, we can check with lucas, and then send a mail to -announce +17:14:25 aba: yes, of course, but I think there's value in having the DPL engaged in the process +17:14:38 bdale: not disagreeing +17:14:58 (that's what I meant with "technically spoken", because there is still some value in speaking before) +17:15:08 ok, so my next action will be to talk to Lucas about the process and where we are. I'm off-net all of next week (really off net) so it'll be the week of the 10th when I get to this +17:15:26 I'll commit to action on this before our next meeting +17:15:41 cool +17:16:22 #action bdale to talk to lucas about process, and e-mail -ctte-private with accepted nominees +17:16:28 #topic Additional Business +17:16:56 so, who plans to be at debconf? +17:17:09 I do +17:17:10 I will not be there, unfortunately +17:17:13 I will be there +17:17:17 I put in a request for a tech ctte bof, too +17:17:29 I plan to be there as well +17:17:32 * rra won't be there this year but will be there next year. +17:17:46 rra: this way we're never going to meet I fear +17:17:48 Though staying some distance away with family; not sure how many evening things I'll get to +17:18:11 aba: you should come to portland; it's pretty awesome +17:18:16 aba: Yeah, the idea of a 10-hour international plane flight fills me with existential dread. :) +17:18:25 cjwatson: been there. I'll be at the venue this year, if we have an organized BOF session that'll at least give all of us present a chance to meet and interact with folks +17:18:38 dondelelcaro: I'd say probabilities are lower for next year than for this +17:18:47 rra: you'd not have liked my Jan/Feb adventures this year, then +17:18:56 rra: nine-hour (or so) international train trip for me, but that's fine :) +17:19:07 Oh, yeah, if I could take the train, I'd totally go. +17:19:09 * bdale likes trains +17:19:12 * rra does too. +17:19:21 rra: you could take the boat at least. +17:19:28 * bdale lol +17:19:38 "take one step, come up for air..." +17:19:39 I hear Carnival Cruise Lines run very well-maintained and clean ships. +17:20:00 h01ger wanted to move debconf to a ship. Let's see if this works out one day +17:20:32 a few more cruise ship incidents, and it might become a really cheap venue? +17:20:42 .oO(how do you know the plan?) +17:20:47 * bdale suspects getting bandwidth to a cruise ship wouldn't be cheap, though +17:21:01 yeah +17:21:03 Yeah, that would be the main thing I'd wonder about. +17:21:04 anyway +17:21:13 I have no other serious business today. does anyone else? +17:21:20 * aba not +17:21:23 * dondelelcaro is good +17:21:28 Nothing more here. +17:21:43 Not I +17:22:01 #endmeeting \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/meetings/20130530/debian-ctte.2013-05-30-16.59.txt b/meetings/20130530/debian-ctte.2013-05-30-16.59.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4518b75 --- /dev/null +++ b/meetings/20130530/debian-ctte.2013-05-30-16.59.txt @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@ +==================== +#debian-ctte Meeting +==================== + + +Meeting started by dondelelcaro at 16:59:31 UTC. The full logs are +available at +http://meetbot.debian.net/debian-ctte/2013/debian-ctte.2013-05-30-16.59.log.html +. + + + +Meeting summary +--------------- +* Who is here? (dondelelcaro, 16:59:36) + +* Next Meeting? (dondelelcaro, 17:02:02) + * AGREED: next meeting to be 27th of June at same time (dondelelcaro, + 17:03:31) + +* #688772 Do the changes to NM address the concerns properly? [Bdale+RMs + to rule] (dondelelcaro, 17:03:41) + +* #698556 and #700759 -- don to deal with these two (dondelelcaro, + 17:05:56) + * ACTION: dondelelcaro to deal with #698556 (dondelelcaro, 17:07:11) + * ACTION: dondelelcaro to deal with #700759 (dondelelcaro, 17:07:14) + +* #636783 super-majority conflict; (dondelelcaro, 17:07:24) + * ACTION: Diziet to write up a proposal (or start of one) for #636783 + (super majority conflcit) (dondelelcaro, 17:10:46) + +* #681419 Depends: foo | foo-nonfree (dondelelcaro, 17:10:52) + +* #685795 New ctte member (dondelelcaro, 17:12:40) + * ACTION: bdale to talk to lucas about process, and e-mail + -ctte-private with accepted nominees (dondelelcaro, 17:16:22) + +* Additional Business (dondelelcaro, 17:16:28) + +Meeting ended at 17:22:01 UTC. + + + + +Action Items +------------ +* dondelelcaro to deal with #698556 +* dondelelcaro to deal with #700759 +* Diziet to write up a proposal (or start of one) for #636783 (super + majority conflcit) +* bdale to talk to lucas about process, and e-mail -ctte-private with + accepted nominees + + + + +Action Items, by person +----------------------- +* bdale + * bdale to talk to lucas about process, and e-mail -ctte-private with + accepted nominees +* dondelelcaro + * dondelelcaro to deal with #698556 + * dondelelcaro to deal with #700759 +* **UNASSIGNED** + * Diziet to write up a proposal (or start of one) for #636783 (super + majority conflcit) + + + + +People Present (lines said) +--------------------------- +* dondelelcaro (49) +* bdale (25) +* aba (19) +* cjwatson (14) +* rra (10) +* vorlon (3) +* MeetBot (2) + + + + +Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 + +.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot