From: fred <fred>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 19:34:01 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: lilypond-0.0.39
X-Git-Tag: release/1.5.59~5261
X-Git-Url: https://git.donarmstrong.com/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=3cade01fdf5f7285b15214d8c132d44b52473792;p=lilypond.git

lilypond-0.0.39
---

diff --git a/Documentation/language.pod b/Documentation/language.pod
index c7e9a81bc9..e316fdc14e 100644
--- a/Documentation/language.pod
+++ b/Documentation/language.pod
@@ -22,12 +22,6 @@ A musical notation that is relatively easy to comprehend to both
 programmers and non programmers. The final aim is to be able to
 express what can be expressed in sheet music.
 
-This document is intended to summarise the plans for mudela 2 (mudela
-0 being mpp-input, and mudela-1 LilyPond input upto version 0.0.38).
-Ideas for any further extensions (mudela 3, read total vapourware)
-should be marked as such.
-
-
 =over 5
 
 =item *
@@ -135,11 +129,6 @@ voices on one staff?
 We might be able to do without the staff{} construct, but I doubt if
 it will make things easier.
 
-=head1 DECISIONS
-
-[none, yet]
-
-
 =head1 THOUGHTS
 
 =head2 Typing
@@ -208,11 +197,7 @@ As simple fix, we might do key declarations:
 
 	\key{\keybes}
 
-[LOOSE]
 
-We could be even more rabid, and use '\rab' as \bar terminator.
-
-Just kidding of course...
 
 [LOOSE THOUGHT]
 
@@ -313,7 +298,7 @@ Mats is an arduous fan of having the commands inside music. I am
 not. I see the Mudela music as something which can be plugged into
 different staffs, transposed, translated in time, copied, quoted,
 etc. Encouraging "inline" commands would be bad since they hinder this
-reuse of mudela-isated music.
+reuse of typed music.
 
 The way I figure it, the bad part is essentially counting
 bars/wholes. Maybe we can get rid of it, by reinstalling the "mark"
@@ -328,7 +313,6 @@ There is another complication: some symbols (bars) sometimes are
 linked across staffs. I should first think of a way to do this in
 LilyPond, before even considering a syntax.
 
-[see also: filtering]
 
 =head2 Volta
 
@@ -338,14 +322,11 @@ uhh?
 
 The syntax of /, * and : has to be settled, we have
 
-	- notes (1, 2, 4, 8 etc), which also can take 1*2/3 to do plets.
+	- notes (1, 2, 4, 8 etc)
 	- meter 2*4
 	- plet 2/3
 	- multiple notes: 3*4
 	- abbreviations (not implemented)  c4/4 or c4*4
-	- measure grouping, {2*4 3*4}
-	- skip 
-
 
 =head2 Filtering
 
@@ -403,6 +384,7 @@ I don't see the big win of this.
 	sc1.staff{<\b1 \b2>}
 	sc1.paper=mypaperdef;
 
+
 We're not doing a programming language. In this syntax the parser has
 to lookup what sc1 means, decide if it should copied shallow/deep,
 decide if has a staff block, switch the mode after it finds that staff
@@ -414,9 +396,6 @@ listening, Philip Glass?), but I think that would be something for
 Mudela version 3. And I think using m4 (or something alike) would be
 just as convenient.
 
-It might clear things up, if JCN told us what is so special about this
-syntax (without the C++ looks).
-
 =head2 Transposition
 
 Has to be done. How about: