--- /dev/null
+Whereas
+
+1. The TC notes the decision of the meta-gnome maintainers to
+ implement our decision in #681834 by:
+ (a) softening the dependency in the gnome-core metapackage
+ from Depends to Recommends, as required
+ (b) adding a new dependency in the gnome metapackage,
+ as a Depends. (In squeeze, this is where the dependency
+ was, but it was a Recommends.)
+
+2. Our intent, as stated in the rationale section of our previous
+ decision (#681834, paras 3 and 5), is that squeeze users who have
+ gnome installed but not network-manager do not find that
+ network-manager becomes installed when they upgrade to wheey.
+
+3. The actions of the meta-gnome maintainers do not achieve this
+ objective.
+
+4. Insofar as any reasons have been advanced for the meta-gnome
+ maintainer's decision, we do not find them convincing.
+
+5. A Recommends from gnome to network-manager-gnome would serve no
+ purpose in wheezy as gnome Depends on gnome-core which already
+ Recommends network-manager-gnome.
+
+Therefore
+
+6. We overrule the decision of the meta-gnome maintainers to add a
+ dependency from gnome to network-manager-gnome. This dependency
+ should be removed.
+
+7. We request that the Release Team unblock update(s) to meta-gnome so
+ that our decisions may be implemented in wheezy.
+
+8. We specifically forbid anyone from introducing in wheezy, or
+ in sid until wheezy is released:
+ a. Any new or enhanced dependencies, or any other mechanisms,
+ which increase the likelihood of network-manager being
+ installed;
+ b. Any new or enhanced user-facing warnings, imprecations, or
+ other kinds of message regarding the alleged desirability or
+ requirement to install network-manager;
+ c. Any change which in any way impairs (or further impairs) the
+ functioning of systems with GNOME components installed but
+ without network-manager;
+ d. Any change which is contrary to the spirit or intent of either
+ our previous resolution in #681834 or this resolution.
+ without first obtaining the permission of at least one member of
+ the Technical Committee.
+
+Furthermore
+
+9. It is disappointing that this proposed solution to the problem was
+ not mentioned during the TC discussion. If it had been, it could
+ have been accepted or rejected by the TC at the time.
+
+10. We remind everyone that the Constitution requires members of the
+ project not to work against decisions properly made according to
+ the project's governance processes. On this occasion we do not
+ feel it necessary to refer anyone to the Debian Account Managers
+ asking for a review of their status.