* mf/feta-bolletjes.mf: rewrite note head MF code.

	(test_outlines): make heads more rotund for smaller sizes.

diff --git a/mf/feta-beugel.mf b/mf/feta-beugel.mf
index 82f996fee958a0ab79173df772c801ab4af84599..a71c2bf789a37db77bfbc61aed510300c65a5ea2 100644 (file)
--- a/mf/feta-beugel.mf
+++ b/mf/feta-beugel.mf
@@ -1,5 +1,11 @@
+
+
 input feta-autometric;
 input feta-macros;
+
+staffsize# := 20 pt#;  %% arbitrary.
+
+
 input feta-params;
 
 font_coding_scheme "feta braces";

diff --git a/mf/feta-params.mf b/mf/feta-params.mf
index 928828d3fb6d5f4fdcebe37df4f434a69b8a1fdb..00a4d45542deaf88b8ade6cd153d5730e4a1f4ab 100644 (file)
--- a/mf/feta-params.mf
+++ b/mf/feta-params.mf
@@ -1,23 +1,25 @@
 
 stafflines = 5;
-% [reuter] URG!  This is not always true.  One of the effects of
-% keeping this a constant is that, for notation with less stafflines,
-% stafflinethickness gets too small.
 
-staff_space#:=staffsize#/(stafflines-1);
+%
+% The design size of a staff should really be the 
+% staff_space, but we use staffsize for historical reasons.
+% 
+staff_space# = staffsize#/(stafflines-1);
 
 
 
 % measuring on pocket scores turns out: stafflinethickness is
 % independent on staff size, and generally 0.5 pt.
-stafflinethickness#  :=0.5 pt#; 
+
+stafflinethickness#  = 0.5 pt#; 
 
 %
 % bigger puff_up_factor, relatively thicker stafflines.
 % 20 pt = puff_up_factor 0.
 % 10 pt = puff_up_factor 1
 %
-puff_up_factor =  (stafflinethickness# - 0.1 staff_space#) / (.1 staff_space#);
+puff_up_factor =  (stafflinethickness# - 0.1 staff_space#) / (0.1 staff_space#);