#741573: My draft from 22nd May

diff --git a/741573_menu_systems/iwj_draft.txt b/741573_menu_systems/iwj_draft.txt
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..d804429
--- /dev/null
+++ b/741573_menu_systems/iwj_draft.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+
+  Context
+
+  1. A dispute about the status of menu systems in Debian, and the
+     contents of policy, has been referred to the Committee.
+
+  2. There are currently two menu systems in Debian: the
+     freedesktop.org (.desktop file based) system, and the traditional
+     Debian menu system.
+
+  3. These two systems have, in general: different maintainers and
+     proponents; often different users; different intended scopes (in
+     the sense of what subset of packages in Debian should provide
+     menu entries); a different emphasis.
+
+  4. The two systems make different choices in response to the need
+     for various technical tradeoffs.  The traditional Debian menu is
+     less feature rich, but is easier for a menu consumer.
+
+  Philosophy
+
+  5. Where feasible, there should be room in Debian for competing
+     implementations of similar functionality; especially when they
+     have different but overlapping sets of goals.  The contributors
+     to each should be enabled to do their work, so long as the cost
+     for the project as a whole is reasonable.
+
+  Conclusions
+
+  6. Both menu systems should be documented in policy.
+
+  7. The documentation for each menu system (specifying file formats,
+     when to include a menu entry, etc.) should follow the views of
+     Debian's experts on, and contributors to, each system.
+
+  8. Lack of an entry in one or other menu system, where that system's
+     scope calls for an entry to be provided, is a bug.  But it is not
+     a release critical bug.
+
+  9. A maintainer should not be criticised for providing a package
+     without doing the work to provide all the applicable menu
+     entries.  However, a maintainer who is offered a reasonable patch
+     should accept it.
+
+  10. We request that the policy team implement this decision.  We
+     leave the specific details of the wording to the policy team.
+