maintainer. Either decision will appear to validate one problematic
behavior or the other.
+4. All relevant and interested parties have been canvassed, via the
+-python list, to find what the possible teams of maintainers are for
+the python interpreter packages. See
+https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20120403083658.GB30420@upsilon.cc
+and the ensuing thread.
+
Therefore,
-4. The committee expresses its disappointment in the communication
+5. The committee expresses its disappointment in the communication
problems which have lead to this issue, and strongly suggests that all
involved parties be as awesome to each other as possible. In the advent
of communication failures or problems, we request that any involved
party contact a third party (such as a member of the technical
committee) to mediate.
-5. The committee requests that all major changes in the python
+6. The committee requests that all major changes in the python
interpreter packages which will affect other packages in Debian be
announced on the appropriate mailing lists before they take effect so
they can be planned for and/or unplanned problems discussed.
-6.
+7.
A The committee resolves that the maintainer of python interpreter
A packages in Debian is a team made up of members decided by (and
A including) Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org>
C The committee declines to change the maintainer of the python
C interpreter packages in Debian.
C
-C 7. The committee requests that Matthias Klose consider adding
+C 8. The committee requests that Matthias Klose consider adding
C additional co-maintainers to the python interpreter package.