X-Git-Url: https://git.donarmstrong.com/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=Documentation%2Fweb%2Fnews-front.itexi;h=93ed4162df722a44bcb2c8c8fd03fa65173a5491;hb=f42142c17b68d84721597f8abf400fa18364b118;hp=a68b6571067b8f654c87ef1f7ea3aa447380571e;hpb=16ac0db39d8cca1de68ce79154386764172aca10;p=lilypond.git diff --git a/Documentation/web/news-front.itexi b/Documentation/web/news-front.itexi index a68b657106..93ed4162df 100644 --- a/Documentation/web/news-front.itexi +++ b/Documentation/web/news-front.itexi @@ -10,25 +10,38 @@ @newsItem -@subsubheading The LilyPond Report #25. @emph{Apr 1st, 2012} +@subsubheading Release candidate withdrawn @emph{July 11, 2012} -The @emph{LilyPond Report} is back, with a rather unusual -issue featuring our young Polish contributor Janek Warchoł! -Also included in this issue are quite a few unexpected items, -including (but not limited to)… a cooking recipe! +We have discovered a regression since 2.14.2, so lilypond 2.15.41 +is no longer a candidate for the 2.16.0 release. However, please +continue testing it -- we would like to discover (and fix!) any +more regressions as soon as possible. If you discover any +problems, please send us @ref{Bug reports}. -Come -@uref{http://news.lilynet.net/?The-LilyPond-Report-25, read -LilyPond Report 25} now; comments and contributions are -warmly encouraged! +@newsEnd + + +@newsItem +@subsubheading Release candidate 8 of 2.16 - LilyPond 2.15.41 released! @emph{July 4, 2012} + +LilyPond 2.15.41 is out; this is the eighth release candidate of +the upcoming 2.16 stable release. All users are invited to +experiment with this version. New features since 2.14.2 are +listed in the @qq{Changes} manual on the website section about +@ref{Development}. + +There are no known Critical issues with this release. If no +Critical bugs are found, then the official 2.16.0 release will be +on 18 July 2012. If you discover any problems, please send us +@ref{Bug reports}. @newsEnd @newsItem -@subsubheading LilyPond 2.15.35 released! @emph{Mar 28, 2012} +@subsubheading LilyPond 2.15.40 released! @emph{June 05, 2012} -We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.15.35. This +We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.15.40. This release contains the usual number of bugfixes. It is strongly recommended that normal users do @strong{not} use @@ -40,15 +53,48 @@ candidate. @newsItem -@subsubheading LilyPond 2.15.34 released! @emph{Mar 19, 2012} +@subsubheading Release candidate withdrawn @emph{June 01, 2012} -We are happy to announce the release of LilyPond 2.15.34. This -release contains the usual number of bugfixes. +We have discovered a regression since 2.14.2, so lilypond 2.15.39 +is no longer a candidate for the 2.16.0 release. However, please +continue testing it -- we would like to discover (and fix!) any +more regressions as soon as possible. If you discover any +problems, please send us @ref{Bug reports}. -It is strongly recommended that normal users do @strong{not} use -this release, and instead use the stable 2.14 version. Please -note that due to a few Critical bugs, this is not the next release -candidate. +@newsEnd + + +@newsItem +@subsubheading Release candidate 7 of 2.16 - LilyPond 2.15.39 released! @emph{May 22, 2012} + +LilyPond 2.15.39 is out; this is the seventh release candidate of +the upcoming 2.16 stable release. All users are invited to +experiment with this version. New features since 2.14.2 are +listed in the @qq{Changes} manual on the website section about +@ref{Development}. + +There are no known Critical issues with this release. If no +Critical bugs are found, then the official 2.16.0 release will be +on 05 June 2012. If you discover any problems, please send us +@ref{Bug reports}. + +@newsEnd + + +@newsItem +@subsubheading The LilyPond Report #26. @emph{May 22, 2012} + +The @emph{LilyPond Report} is back, with a new editor on board - +Pavel Roskin, who tells us about his adventures in strange lands +of compiler bugs! There is also a detailed report about current +development status, and an analysis of example LilyPond output - +see for yourself how close (or how far?) are we from matching +the quality of hand-engraved scores. + +Come +@uref{http://news.lilynet.net/?The-LilyPond-Report-26, read +LilyPond Report 26} now; comments and contributions are +warmly encouraged! @newsEnd