<item>
must not require a package outside of <em>main</em>
for compilation or execution (thus, the package must
- not declare a <tt>Pre-Depends</tt>, <tt>Depends</tt>,
- <tt>Recommends</tt>, <tt>Build-Depends</tt>,
- or <tt>Build-Depends-Indep</tt> relationship on a
- non-<em>main</em> package unless a package
- in <em>main</em> is listed as an alternative),
+ not declare a "Depends", "Recommends", or
+ "Build-Depends" relationship on a non-<em>main</em>
+ package),
</item>
<item>
must not be so buggy that we refuse to support them,
<p>
In general, Debian packages should use the same version
- numbers as the upstream sources.
- </p>
-
- <p>
- However, in some cases where the upstream version number is
- based on a date (e.g., a development "snapshot" release) the
- package management system cannot handle these version
- numbers without epochs. For example, dpkg will consider
- "96May01" to be greater than "96Dec24".
+ numbers as the upstream sources. However, upstream version
+ numbers based on some date formats (sometimes used for
+ development or "snapshot" releases) will not be ordered
+ correctly by the package management software. For
+ example, <prng>dpkg</prng> will consider "96May01" to be
+ greater than "96Dec24".
</p>
<p>
To prevent having to use epochs for every new upstream
- version, the date based portion of the version number
- should be changed to the following format in such cases:
- "19960501", "19961224". It is up to the maintainer whether
- they want to bother the upstream maintainer to change
- the version numbers upstream, too.
+ version, the date-based portion of any upstream version number
+ should be given in a way that sorts correctly: four-digit year
+ first, followed by a two-digit numeric month, followed by a
+ two-digit numeric date, possibly with punctuation between the
+ components.
</p>
<p>
- Note that other version formats based on dates which are
- parsed correctly by the package management system should
- <em>not</em> be changed.
- </p>
-
- <p>
- Native Debian packages (i.e., packages which have been
- written especially for Debian) whose version numbers include
- dates should always use the "YYYYMMDD" format.
+ Native Debian packages (i.e., packages which have been written
+ especially for Debian) whose version numbers include dates
+ should also follow these rules. If punctuation is desired
+ between the date components, remember that hyphen (<tt>-</tt>)
+ cannot be used in native package versions. Period
+ (<tt>.</tt>) is normally a good choice.
</p>
</sect1>
</sect>
- <sect>
+ <sect id="maintainer">
<heading>The maintainer of a package</heading>
<p>
- Every package must have a Debian maintainer (the
- maintainer may be one person or a group of people
- reachable from a common email address, such as a mailing
- list). The maintainer is responsible for ensuring that
- the package is placed in the appropriate distributions.
- </p>
-
- <p>
- The maintainer must be specified in the
- <tt>Maintainer</tt> control field with their correct name
- and a working email address. If one person maintains
- several packages, they should try to avoid having
- different forms of their name and email address in
+ Every package must have a maintainer. The maintainer may be one
+ person or a group of people reachable from a common email
+ address, such as a mailing list. The maintainer is responsible
+ for maintaining the Debian packaging files, evaluating and
+ responding appropriately to reported bugs, uploading new
+ versions of the package (either directly or through a sponsor),
+ ensuring that the package is placed in the appropriate archive
+ area and included in Debian releases as appropriate for the
+ stability and utility of the package, and requesting removal of
+ the package from the Debian distribution if it is no longer
+ useful or maintainable.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ The maintainer must be specified in the <tt>Maintainer</tt>
+ control field with their correct name and a working email
+ address. The email address given in the <tt>Maintainer</tt>
+ control field must accept mail from those role accounts in
+ Debian used to send automated mails regarding the package. This
+ includes non-spam mail from the bug-tracking system, all mail
+ from the Debian archive maintenance software, and other role
+ accounts or automated processes that are commonly agreed on by
+ the project.<footnote>
+ A sample implementation of such a whitelist written for the
+ Mailman mailing list management software is used for mailing
+ lists hosted by alioth.debian.org.
+ </footnote>
+ If one person or team maintains several packages, they should
+ use the same form of their name and email address in
the <tt>Maintainer</tt> fields of those packages.
</p>
</p>
<p>
- If the maintainer of a package quits from the Debian
- project, "Debian QA Group"
- <email>packages@qa.debian.org</email> takes over the
- maintainer-ship of the package until someone else
- volunteers for that task. These packages are called
- <em>orphaned packages</em>.<footnote>
- The detailed procedure for doing this gracefully can
- be found in the Debian Developer's Reference,
- see <ref id="related">.
- </footnote>
+ If the maintainer of the package is a team of people with a
+ shared email address, the <tt>Uploaders</tt> control field must
+ be present and must contain at least one human with their
+ personal email address. See <ref id="f-Uploaders"> for the
+ syntax of that field.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ If the maintainer of a package no longer has time or desire to
+ maintain a package, it will be orphaned according to the
+ procedure described in the Debian Developer's Reference
+ (see <ref id="related">). The maintainer then
+ becomes <tt>Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org></tt>.
+ These packages are considered maintained by the Debian project
+ as a whole until someone else volunteers to take over
+ maintenance.
</p>
</sect>
putting the name in round brackets and moving it to the
end, and bringing the email address forward).
</p>
+
+ <p>
+ See <ref id="maintainer"> for additional requirements and
+ information about package maintainers.
+ </p>
</sect1>
<sect1 id="f-Uploaders">
<heading><tt>Uploaders</tt></heading>
<p>
- List of the names and email addresses of co-maintainers of
- the package, if any. If the package has other maintainers
- beside the one named in the
- <qref id="f-Maintainer">Maintainer field</qref>, their names
- and email addresses should be listed here. The format of each
- entry is the same as that of the Maintainer field, and
- multiple entries must be comma separated. This is an optional
- field.
+ List of the names and email addresses of co-maintainers of the
+ package, if any. If the package has other maintainers besides
+ the one named in the <qref id="f-Maintainer">Maintainer
+ field</qref>, their names and email addresses should be listed
+ here. The format of each entry is the same as that of the
+ Maintainer field, and multiple entries must be comma
+ separated.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ This is normally an optional field, but if
+ the <tt>Maintainer</tt> control field names a group of people
+ and a shared email address, the <tt>Uploaders</tt> field must
+ be present and must contain at least one human with their
+ personal email address.
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
- All fields that specify build-time relationships
+ Relationships may be restricted to a certain set of
+ architectures. This is indicated in brackets after each
+ individual package name and the optional version specification.
+ The brackets enclose a list of Debian architecture names
+ separated by whitespace. Exclamation marks may be prepended to
+ each of the names. (It is not permitted for some names to be
+ prepended with exclamation marks while others aren't.)
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ For build relationship fields
(<tt>Build-Depends</tt>, <tt>Build-Depends-Indep</tt>,
- <tt>Build-Conflicts</tt> and <tt>Build-Conflicts-Indep</tt>)
- may be restricted to a certain set of architectures. This
- is indicated in brackets after each individual package name and
- the optional version specification. The brackets enclose a
- list of Debian architecture names separated by whitespace.
- Exclamation marks may be prepended to each of the names.
- (It is not permitted for some names to be prepended with
- exclamation marks while others aren't.) If the current Debian
- host architecture is not in this list and there are no
- exclamation marks in the list, or it is in the list with a
- prepended exclamation mark, the package name and the
- associated version specification are ignored completely for
- the purposes of defining the relationships.
+ <tt>Build-Conflicts</tt> and <tt>Build-Conflicts-Indep</tt>), if
+ the current Debian host architecture is not in this list and
+ there are no exclamation marks in the list, or it is in the list
+ with a prepended exclamation mark, the package name and the
+ associated version specification are ignored completely for the
+ purposes of defining the relationships.
</p>
<p>
<tt>gnumach-dev</tt> only on hurd-i386.
</p>
+ <p>
+ For binary relationship fields, the architecture restriction
+ syntax is only supported in the source package control
+ file <file>debian/control</file>. When the corresponding binary
+ package control file is generated, the relationship will either
+ be omitted or included without the architecture restriction
+ based on the architecture of the binary package. This means
+ that architecture restrictions must not be used in binary
+ relationship fields for architecture-independent packages
+ (<tt>Architecture: all</tt>).
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ For example:
+ <example compact="compact">
+Depends: foo [i386], bar [amd64]
+ </example>
+ becomes <tt>Depends: foo</tt> when the package is built on
+ the <tt>i386</tt> architecture, <tt>Depends: bar</tt> when the
+ package is built on the <tt>amd64</tt> architecture, and omitted
+ entirely in binary packages built on all other architectures.
+ </p>
+
<p>
If the architecture-restricted dependency is part of a set of
alternatives using <tt>|</tt>, that alternative is ignored
</p>
<p>
- All fields that specify build-time relationships may also be
- restricted to a certain set of architectures using architecture
- wildcards. The syntax for declaring such restrictions is the
- same as declaring restrictions using a certain set of
- architectures without architecture wildcards. For example:
+ Relationships may also be restricted to a certain set of
+ architectures using architecture wildcards. The syntax for
+ declaring such restrictions is the same as declaring
+ restrictions using a certain set of architectures without
+ architecture wildcards. For example:
<example compact="compact">
Build-Depends: foo [linux-any], bar [any-i386], baz [!linux-any]
</example>
example, <ref id="binaries">.
</p>
+ <p>
+ Neither <tt>Breaks</tt> nor <tt>Conflicts</tt> should be used
+ unless two packages cannot be installed at the same time or
+ installing them both causes one of them to be broken or
+ unusable. Having similar functionality or performing the same
+ tasks as another package is not sufficient reason to
+ declare <tt>Breaks</tt> or <tt>Conflicts</tt> with that package.
+ </p>
+
<p>
A <tt>Conflicts</tt> entry may have an "earlier than" version
clause if the reason for the conflict is corrected in a later
<p>
There is no Build-Depends-Arch; this role is essentially
met with Build-Depends. Anyone building the
- <tt>build-indep</tt> and binary-indep<tt></tt> targets is
+ <tt>build-indep</tt> and <tt>binary-indep</tt> targets is
assumed to be building the whole package, and therefore
installation of all build dependencies is required.
</p>
</p>
<p>
- Thus, when a package is built which contains any shared
- libraries, it must provide a <file>shlibs</file> file for other
- packages to use, and when a package is built which contains
- any shared libraries or compiled binaries, it must run
+ When a package is built which contains any shared libraries, it
+ must provide a <file>shlibs</file> file for other packages to
+ use. When a package is built which contains any shared
+ libraries or compiled binaries, it must run
<qref id="pkg-dpkg-shlibdeps"><prgn>dpkg-shlibdeps</prgn></qref>
on these to determine the libraries used and hence the
dependencies needed by this package.<footnote>
<p>
- In the past, the shared libraries linked to were
- determined by calling <prgn>ldd</prgn>, but now
- <prgn>objdump</prgn> is used to do this. The only
- change this makes to package building is that
- <prgn>dpkg-shlibdeps</prgn> must also be run on shared
- libraries, whereas in the past this was unnecessary.
- The rest of this footnote explains the advantage that
- this method gives.
+ <prgn>dpkg-shlibdeps</prgn> will use a program
+ like <prgn>objdump</prgn> or <prgn>readelf</prgn> to find
+ the libraries directly needed by the binaries or shared
+ libraries in the package.
</p>
<p>
We say that a binary <tt>foo</tt> <em>directly</em> uses
a library <tt>libbar</tt> if it is explicitly linked
- with that library (that is, it uses the flag
- <tt>-lbar</tt> during the linking stage). Other
+ with that library (that is, the library is listed in the ELF
+ <tt>NEEDED</tt> attribute, caused by adding <tt>-lbar</tt>
+ to the link line when the binary is created). Other
libraries that are needed by <tt>libbar</tt> are linked
<em>indirectly</em> to <tt>foo</tt>, and the dynamic
linker will load them automatically when it loads
- <tt>libbar</tt>. A package should depend on
- the libraries it directly uses, and the dependencies for
- those libraries should automatically pull in the other
- libraries.
- </p>
-
- <p>
- Unfortunately, the <prgn>ldd</prgn> program shows both
- the directly and indirectly used libraries, meaning that
- the dependencies determined included both direct and
- indirect dependencies. The use of <prgn>objdump</prgn>
- avoids this problem by determining only the directly
- used libraries.
+ <tt>libbar</tt>. A package should depend on the libraries
+ it directly uses, but not the libraries it indirectly uses.
+ The dependencies for those libraries will automatically pull
+ in the other libraries.
</p>
<p>
A good example of where this helps is the following. We
could update <tt>libimlib</tt> with a new version that
- supports a new graphics format called dgf (but retaining
- the same major version number). If we used the old
- <prgn>ldd</prgn> method, every package that uses
- <tt>libimlib</tt> would need to be recompiled so it
- would also depend on <tt>libdgf</tt> or it wouldn't run
- due to missing symbols. However with the new system,
- packages using <tt>libimlib</tt> can rely on
- <tt>libimlib</tt> itself having the dependency on
- <tt>libdgf</tt> and so they would not need rebuilding.
+ supports a new graphics format called dgf (but retaining the
+ same major version number) and depends on <tt>libdgf</tt>.
+ If we used <prgn>ldd</prgn> to add dependencies for every
+ library directly or indirectly linked with a binary, every
+ package that uses <tt>libimlib</tt> would need to be
+ recompiled so it would also depend on <tt>libdgf</tt> or it
+ wouldn't run due to missing symbols. Since dependencies are
+ only added based on ELF <tt>NEEDED</tt> attribute, packages
+ using <tt>libimlib</tt> can rely on <tt>libimlib</tt> itself
+ having the dependency on <tt>libdgf</tt> and so they would
+ not need rebuilding.
</p>
</footnote>
</p>
<p><file>debian/shlibs.local</file></p>
<p>
- This lists overrides for this package. Its use is
- described below (see <ref id="shlibslocal">).
+ This lists overrides for this package. This file should
+ normally not be used, but may be needed temporarily in
+ unusual situations to work around bugs in other packages,
+ or in unusual cases where the normally declared dependency
+ information in the installed <file>shlibs</file> file for
+ a library cannot be used. This file overrides information
+ obtained from any other source.
</p>
</item>
<p><file>DEBIAN/shlibs</file> files in the "build directory"</p>
<p>
- When packages are being built, any
- <file>debian/shlibs</file> files are copied into the
+ When packages are being built,
+ any <file>debian/shlibs</file> files are copied into the
control file area of the temporary build directory and
given the name <file>shlibs</file>. These files give
- details of any shared libraries included in the
+ details of any shared libraries included in the same
package.<footnote>
- An example may help here. Let us say that the
- source package <tt>foo</tt> generates two binary
- packages, <tt>libfoo2</tt> and
- <tt>foo-runtime</tt>. When building the binary
- packages, the two packages are created in the
- directories <file>debian/libfoo2</file> and
- <file>debian/foo-runtime</file> respectively.
- (<file>debian/tmp</file> could be used instead of one
- of these.) Since <tt>libfoo2</tt> provides the
- <tt>libfoo</tt> shared library, it will require a
- <tt>shlibs</tt> file, which will be installed in
- <file>debian/libfoo2/DEBIAN/shlibs</file>, eventually
- to become
- <file>/var/lib/dpkg/info/libfoo2.shlibs</file>. Then
- when <prgn>dpkg-shlibdeps</prgn> is run on the
- executable
- <file>debian/foo-runtime/usr/bin/foo-prog</file>, it
- will examine the
- <file>debian/libfoo2/DEBIAN/shlibs</file> file to
- determine whether <tt>foo-prog</tt>'s library
- dependencies are satisfied by any of the libraries
- provided by <tt>libfoo2</tt>. For this reason,
- <prgn>dpkg-shlibdeps</prgn> must only be run once
- all of the individual binary packages'
- <tt>shlibs</tt> files have been installed into the
- build directory.
+ An example may help here. Let us say that the source
+ package <tt>foo</tt> generates two binary
+ packages, <tt>libfoo2</tt> and <tt>foo-runtime</tt>.
+ When building the binary packages, the two packages are
+ created in the directories <file>debian/libfoo2</file>
+ and <file>debian/foo-runtime</file> respectively.
+ (<file>debian/tmp</file> could be used instead of one of
+ these.) Since <tt>libfoo2</tt> provides the
+ <tt>libfoo</tt> shared library, it will require a
+ <tt>shlibs</tt> file, which will be installed in
+ <file>debian/libfoo2/DEBIAN/shlibs</file>, eventually to
+ become <file>/var/lib/dpkg/info/libfoo2.shlibs</file>.
+ When <prgn>dpkg-shlibdeps</prgn> is run on the
+ executable <file>debian/foo-runtime/usr/bin/foo-prog</file>,
+ it will examine
+ the <file>debian/libfoo2/DEBIAN/shlibs</file> file to
+ determine whether <tt>foo-prog</tt>'s library
+ dependencies are satisfied by any of the libraries
+ provided by <tt>libfoo2</tt>. For this reason,
+ <prgn>dpkg-shlibdeps</prgn> must only be run once all of
+ the individual binary packages' <tt>shlibs</tt> files
+ have been installed into the build directory.
</footnote>
</p>
</item>
</example>
Otherwise, you will need to explicitly list the compiled
binaries and libraries.<footnote>
- If you are using <tt>debhelper</tt>, the
- <prgn>dh_shlibdeps</prgn> program will do this work for
- you. It will also correctly handle multi-binary
- packages.
+ If you are using <tt>debhelper</tt>, the
+ <prgn>dh_shlibdeps</prgn> program will do this work for you.
+ It will also correctly handle multi-binary packages.
</footnote>
</p>
field in the control file for this to work.
</p>
- <p>
- If <prgn>dpkg-shlibdeps</prgn> doesn't complain, you're
- done. If it does complain you might need to create your own
- <file>debian/shlibs.local</file> file, as explained below (see
- <ref id="shlibslocal">).
- </p>
-
<p>
If you have multiple binary packages, you will need to call
<prgn>dpkg-shlibdeps</prgn> on each one which contains
you will need to specify that <prgn>dpkg-shlibdeps</prgn>
should use the dependency line of type <tt>udeb</tt> by
adding the <tt>-tudeb</tt> option<footnote>
- <prgn>dh_shlibdeps</prgn> from the <tt>debhelper</tt> suite
- will automatically add this option if it knows it is
- processing a udeb.
- </footnote>. If there is no dependency line of type <tt>udeb</tt>
- in the <file>shlibs</file> file, <prgn>dpkg-shlibdeps</prgn> will
- fall back to the regular dependency line.
+ <prgn>dh_shlibdeps</prgn> from the <tt>debhelper</tt> suite
+ will automatically add this option if it knows it is
+ processing a udeb.
+ </footnote>. If there is no dependency line of
+ type <tt>udeb</tt> in the <file>shlibs</file>
+ file, <prgn>dpkg-shlibdeps</prgn> will fall back to the regular
+ dependency line.
</p>
<p>
- For more details on dpkg-shlibdeps, please see
+ For more details on <prgn>dpkg-shlibdeps</prgn>, please see
<ref id="pkg-dpkg-shlibdeps"> and
<manref name="dpkg-shlibdeps" section="1">.
</p>
usually of the form
<tt><var>name</var>.so.<var>major-version</var></tt>, in our
example, <tt>libz.so.1</tt>.<footnote>
- This can be determined using the command
- <example compact="compact">
+ This can be determined using the command
+ <example compact="compact">
objdump -p /usr/lib/libz.so.1.1.3 | grep SONAME
- </example>
+ </example>
</footnote>
The version part is the part which comes after
- <tt>.so.</tt>, so in our case, it is <tt>1</tt>.
+ <tt>.so.</tt>, so in our case, it is <tt>1</tt>. The soname may
+ instead be of the form
+ <tt><var>name</var>-<var>major-version</var>.so</tt>, such
+ as <tt>libdb-4.8.so</tt>, in which case the name would
+ be <tt>libdb</tt> and the version would be <tt>4.8</tt>.
</p>
<p>
<file>shlibs</file> file in the control area directly from
<file>debian/rules</file> without using a <file>debian/shlibs</file>
file at all,<footnote>
- This is what <prgn>dh_makeshlibs</prgn> in the
- <tt>debhelper</tt> suite does. If your package also has a udeb
- that provides a shared library, <prgn>dh_makeshlibs</prgn> can
- automatically generate the <tt>udeb:</tt> lines if you specify
- the name of the udeb with the <tt>--add-udeb</tt> option.
+ This is what <prgn>dh_makeshlibs</prgn> in
+ the <package>debhelper</package> suite does. If your package
+ also has a udeb that provides a shared
+ library, <prgn>dh_makeshlibs</prgn> can automatically generate
+ the <tt>udeb:</tt> lines if you specify the name of the udeb
+ with the <tt>--add-udeb</tt> option.
</footnote>
since the <file>debian/shlibs</file> file itself is ignored by
<prgn>dpkg-shlibdeps</prgn>.
packages.
</p>
</sect1>
-
- <sect1 id="shlibslocal">
- <heading>Writing the <file>debian/shlibs.local</file> file</heading>
-
- <p>
- This file is intended only as a <em>temporary</em> fix if
- your binaries or libraries depend on a library whose package
- does not yet provide a correct <file>shlibs</file> file.
- </p>
-
- <p>
- We will assume that you are trying to package a binary
- <tt>foo</tt>. When you try running
- <prgn>dpkg-shlibdeps</prgn> you get the following error
- message (<tt>-O</tt> displays the dependency information on
- <tt>stdout</tt> instead of writing it to
- <tt>debian/substvars</tt>, and the lines have been wrapped
- for ease of reading):
- <example compact="compact">
-$ dpkg-shlibdeps -O debian/tmp/usr/bin/foo
-dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: unable to find dependency
- information for shared library libbar (soname 1,
- path /usr/lib/libbar.so.1, dependency field Depends)
-shlibs:Depends=libc6 (>= 2.2.2-2)
- </example>
- You can then run <prgn>ldd</prgn> on the binary to find the
- full location of the library concerned:
- <example compact="compact">
-$ ldd foo
-libbar.so.1 => /usr/lib/libbar.so.1 (0x4001e000)
-libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40032000)
-/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
- </example>
- So the <prgn>foo</prgn> binary depends on the
- <prgn>libbar</prgn> shared library, but no package seems to
- provide a <file>*.shlibs</file> file handling
- <file>libbar.so.1</file> in <file>/var/lib/dpkg/info/</file>. Let's
- determine the package responsible:
- <example compact="compact">
-$ dpkg -S /usr/lib/libbar.so.1
-bar1: /usr/lib/libbar.so.1
-$ dpkg -s bar1 | grep Version
-Version: 1.0-1
- </example>
- This tells us that the <tt>bar1</tt> package, version 1.0-1,
- is the one we are using. Now we can file a bug against the
- <tt>bar1</tt> package and create our own
- <file>debian/shlibs.local</file> to locally fix the problem.
- Including the following line into your
- <file>debian/shlibs.local</file> file:
- <example compact="compact">
-libbar 1 bar1 (>= 1.0-1)
- </example>
- should allow the package build to work.
- </p>
-
- <p>
- As soon as the maintainer of <tt>bar1</tt> provides a
- correct <file>shlibs</file> file, you should remove this line
- from your <file>debian/shlibs.local</file> file. (You should
- probably also then have a versioned <tt>Build-Depends</tt>
- on <tt>bar1</tt> to help ensure that others do not have the
- same problem building your package.)
- </p>
- </sect1>
-
</sect>
-
</chapt>
for C files) will need to be compiled twice, for the normal
case.
</p>
+
<p>
- You must specify the gcc option <tt>-D_REENTRANT</tt>
- when building a library (either static or shared) to make
- the library compatible with LinuxThreads.
+ Libraries should be built with threading support and to be
+ thread-safe if the library supports this.
</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>
- An ever increasing number of packages are using
- <prgn>libtool</prgn> to do their linking. The latest GNU
- libtools (>= 1.3a) can take advantage of the metadata in the
- installed <prgn>libtool</prgn> archive files (<file>*.la</file>
- files). The main advantage of <prgn>libtool</prgn>'s
- <file>.la</file> files is that it allows <prgn>libtool</prgn> to
- store and subsequently access metadata with respect to the
- libraries it builds. <prgn>libtool</prgn> will search for
- those files, which contain a lot of useful information about
- a library (such as library dependency information for static
- linking). Also, they're <em>essential</em> for programs
- using <tt>libltdl</tt>.<footnote>
- Although <prgn>libtool</prgn> is fully capable of
- linking against shared libraries which don't have
- <tt>.la</tt> files, as it is a mere shell script it can
- add considerably to the build time of a
- <prgn>libtool</prgn>-using package if that shell script
- has to derive all this information from first principles
- for each library every time it is linked. With the
- advent of <prgn>libtool</prgn> version 1.4 (and to a
- lesser extent <prgn>libtool</prgn> version 1.3), the
- <file>.la</file> files also store information about
- inter-library dependencies which cannot necessarily be
- derived after the <file>.la</file> file is deleted.
+ Packages that use <prgn>libtool</prgn> to create and install
+ their shared libraries install a file containing additional
+ metadata (ending in <file>.la</file>) alongside the library.
+ For public libraries intended for use by other packages, these
+ files normally should not be included in the Debian package,
+ since the information they include is not necessary to link with
+ the shared library on Debian and can add unnecessary additional
+ dependencies to other programs or libraries.<footnote>
+ These files store, among other things, all libraries on which
+ that shared library depends. Unfortunately, if
+ the <file>.la</file> file is present and contains that
+ dependency information, using <prgn>libtool</prgn> when
+ linking against that library will cause the resulting program
+ or library to be linked against those dependencies as well,
+ even if this is unnecessary. This can create unneeded
+ dependencies on shared library packages that would otherwise
+ be hidden behind the library ABI, and can make library
+ transitions to new SONAMEs unnecessarily complicated and
+ difficult to manage.
</footnote>
+ If the <file>.la</file> file is required for that library (if,
+ for instance, it's loaded via <tt>libltdl</tt> in a way that
+ requires that meta-information), the <tt>dependency_libs</tt>
+ setting in the <file>.la</file> file should normally be set to
+ the empty string. If the shared library development package has
+ historically included the <file>.la</file>, it must be retained
+ in the development package (with <tt>dependency_libs</tt>
+ emptied) until all libraries that depend on it have removed or
+ emptied <tt>dependency_libs</tt> in their <file>.la</file>
+ files to prevent linking with those other libraries
+ using <prgn>libtool</prgn> from failing.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ If the <file>.la</file> must be included, it should be included
+ in the development (<tt>-dev</tt>) package, unless the library
+ will be loaded by <prgn>libtool</prgn>'s <tt>libltdl</tt>
+ library. If it is intended for use with <tt>libltdl</tt>,
+ the <file>.la</file> files must go in the run-time library
+ package.
</p>
<p>
- Packages that use <prgn>libtool</prgn> to create shared
- libraries should include the <file>.la</file> files in the
- <tt>-dev</tt> package, unless the package relies on
- <tt>libtool</tt>'s <tt>libltdl</tt> library, in which case
- the <tt>.la</tt> files must go in the run-time library
- package.
+ These requirements for handling of <file>.la</file> files do not
+ apply to loadable modules or libraries not installed in
+ directories searched by default by the dynamic linker. Packages
+ installing loadable modules will frequently need to install
+ the <file>.la</file> files alongside the modules so that they
+ can be loaded by <tt>libltdl</tt>. <tt>dependency_libs</tt>
+ does not need to be modified for libraries or modules that are
+ not installed in directories searched by the dynamic linker by
+ default and not intended for use by other packages.
</p>
<p>
<example compact="compact">
/usr/lib/cgi-bin/<var>cgi-bin-name</var>
</example>
- and should be referred to as
+ or a subdirectory of that directory, and should be
+ referred to as
<example compact="compact">
http://localhost/cgi-bin/<var>cgi-bin-name</var>
</example>
-
+ (possibly with a subdirectory name
+ before <var>cgi-bin-name</var>).
</item>
<item>
projects / debian / debian-policy.git / blobdiff