final warp for ape 3.0-2

[ape.git] / man / diversity.contrast.test.Rd

diff --git a/man/diversity.contrast.test.Rd b/man/diversity.contrast.test.Rd
index dd6e7ca7ec53d01146cfa7b92f245cf96e25e765..c55acc7e6f6fa837eb752980d4b2c73230d038af 100644 (file)
--- a/man/diversity.contrast.test.Rd
+++ b/man/diversity.contrast.test.Rd
@@ -31,10 +31,11 @@ diversity.contrast.test(x, method = "ratiolog",
   If \code{method = "ratiolog"}, the test described in Barraclough et
   al. (1996) is performed. If \code{method = "proportion"}, the version
   in Barraclough et al. (1995) is used. If \code{method = "difference"},
   If \code{method = "ratiolog"}, the test described in Barraclough et
   al. (1996) is performed. If \code{method = "proportion"}, the version
   in Barraclough et al. (1995) is used. If \code{method = "difference"},

-  the signed difference is used (Sargent 2004). If \code{method =
-    "logratio"}, then this is Wiegmann et al.'s (1993) version. These
+  the signed difference is used (Sargent 2004). If \code{method = "logratio"},
+  then this is Wiegmann et al.'s (1993) version. These

   four tests are essentially different versions of the same test (Vamosi
   four tests are essentially different versions of the same test (Vamosi

-  and Vamosi 2005, Vamosi 2007).
+  and Vamosi 2005, Vamosi 2007). See Paradis (2012) for a comparison of
+  their statistical performance with other tests.

 
   If \code{nrep = 0}, a Wilcoxon test is done on the species diversity
   contrasts with the null hypothesis is that they are distributed around
 
   If \code{nrep = 0}, a Wilcoxon test is done on the species diversity
   contrasts with the null hypothesis is that they are distributed around


@@ -57,6 +58,10 @@ diversity.contrast.test(x, method = "ratiolog",
   flowering plants (angiosperms). \emph{Proceedings of the Royal Society
     of London. Series B. Biological Sciences}, \bold{263}, 589--591.
 
   flowering plants (angiosperms). \emph{Proceedings of the Royal Society
     of London. Series B. Biological Sciences}, \bold{263}, 589--591.
 

+  Paradis, E. (2012) Shift in diversification in sister-clade
+  comparisons: a more powerful test. \emph{Evolution}, \bold{66},
+  288--295.
+

   Sargent, R. D. (2004) Floral symmetry affects speciation rates in
   angiosperms. \emph{Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series
   B. Biological Sciences}, \bold{271}, 603--608.
   Sargent, R. D. (2004) Floral symmetry affects speciation rates in
   angiosperms. \emph{Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series
   B. Biological Sciences}, \bold{271}, 603--608.