\version "1.7.18"
-% TODO: move to regression or remove?
-\header{
-%texidoc = "This file tests slurs"
-texidoc = "DELETE, or possibly REGRESSION. "
+\header{ texidoc = "Broken parts of slurs should show the trend of the
+encompassed notes."
}
-
-%% todo: this is very old, still talks about "feta embedded" slurs?
-
-
shortlong = \notes{
c4(c-)( c c |
c c c c |
}
broken = \notes\transpose c c'{
-
c c c c(
- c-) c c c(
c c-) c c(
- c c c-) c(
a'-) a' a' a'()
- a' a' a' a'()
- c( c c c-)
- c( c c f,-)
- f,( c c c-)
- f,( c c f,-)
+ a' a' a' a'(
}
\score{
\notes{
-% \shortlong
\broken
}
\paper{
- indent = 0.0\pt
- %for broken!
- linewidth= 30.\mm
-
+ raggedright = ##t
}
}
\version "1.7.18"
-% I don't see the point. I'll add this to my next round
-% of delete'ing, unless Han notices this comment in the
-% changelog and deletes it before I ask. :) -gp
-\header {texidoc = "DELETE ME " }
+\header {
-%\header { texidoc="@cindex Grace End
-%You can put grace notes after a note. " }
+ texidoc="@cindex Grace End
+ Grace notes after the last note do not confuse the timing code."
+
+
+}
\score {
\context Voice \notes\relative c {
\version "1.7.18"
-% candidate for regression. -gp
-\header { texidoc = "REGRESSION or DELETE " }
+\header {
+
+ texidoc = "Point-symmetric beams should receive the same
+ quanting. There is no up/down bias in the quanting code."
+
+}
+
\score{
\notes\relative c'{
a8-[ b'' a,, b'']
b8-[ a,, b'' a,,]
- \stemUp [ b8 \stemDown b'']
}
\paper{
raggedright = ##t