Regtests: typo.

I mixed up "quanting" and "quantizing".  Sorry.

diff --git a/input/regression/baerenreiter-sarabande.ly b/input/regression/baerenreiter-sarabande.ly
index 5a826bc593e7eabfe41a9aa20e0c781108ac0cf9..f0f2cd4da58e441c49c49fd8f99334927015d670 100644 (file)
--- a/input/regression/baerenreiter-sarabande.ly
+++ b/input/regression/baerenreiter-sarabande.ly
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ include articulation, but it does follows the same beaming and
 linebreaking as the printed edition. This is done in order to
 benchmark the quality of the LilyPond output.
 
-As of lilypond 1.5.42, the spacing and beam quantizing is almost
+As of lilypond 1.5.42, the spacing and beam quanting is almost
 identical.
 
 There are two tweaks in this file: a line-break was forced before

diff --git a/input/regression/beam-concave.ly b/input/regression/beam-concave.ly
index 093f30d918dd1819072b10ff8be7997fb69b2d3c..f104b16ef13e7279b9eccb5fde200d81cfcbebc9 100644 (file)
--- a/input/regression/beam-concave.ly
+++ b/input/regression/beam-concave.ly
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
   beam. If an up-beam has high notes on its center stems, then we call
   it concave.
 
-  If a beam is fails a test, the desired slope is printed next to it.
+  If a beam fails a test, the desired slope is printed next to it.
 
 " 
 }