a few other comments in files.
* input/test/equaliser.ly: renamed to midi-volume-equaliser.ly.
+ * input/test/ various : mark files for deletion or moving to regression.
+
2003-06-17 Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanwen@cs.uu.nl>
* scm/music-functions.scm (make-ottava-set):
\version "1.7.18"
\header{
texidoc = "@cindex Beaming Presets
-The auto-beam engraver has presets for common time signatures.
-"
-}
+The auto-beam engraver has presets for common time signatures. " }
\score{
\notes \relative c''{
- % urg: something breaks in grouping see input/bugs/time-grouping.ly
- %
- % really? it looks fine to me. I think the above note is old; remove
- % these lines in the next revision.
\time 1/2
c8 c c c
c16 c c c c c c c
\header {
% this example doesn't look very useful. Perhaps remove it in
% the future, although it _does_ demonstrate a neat feature of
-% lilypond. Maybe regression? Or a "neat features" page
-% (one of the intro pages, maybe?) -gp
-% OTOH, this is probably a basic lesson for engraving music,
-% so it might not be worth advertising it. :) -gp
+% lilypond. Maybe regression?
texidoc = "@cindex Beam Damp
Beams are less steep than the notes they encompass.
+DELETE or REGRESSION
" }
\version "1.7.18"
\header {
texidoc="@cindex Beam Stem Test
Beam-stem attachment test. Helper file for ps/dvips problems.
-" }
+REGRESSION or DELETE. " }
\score {
\context RhythmicStaff \notes {
\version "1.7.18"
-% this looks like an example of slurs, not beaming. But we
-% already have lots of examples of slurs. candidate for
-% future remove-ing.
+% this looks like an example of slurs, not beaming. And it
+% looks like regression.
% possible rename to slur-something.
+\header { texidoc = "REGRESSION or DELETE " }
\score{
\notes \relative c''{
\slurUp c8-(-( c-)-( c4-)-)
% TODO: move to regression or remove?
\header{
-texidoc = "This file tests slurs"
+%texidoc = "This file tests slurs"
+texidoc = "DELETE, or possibly REGRESSION. "
}
%% todo: this is very old, still talks about "feta embedded" slurs?
\version "1.7.18"
-% TODO: rethink name and whole file -- possible remove or major
+% TODO: rethink name and whole file -- possible delete or major
% changes.
\header{
texidoc="@cindex Coda Kludge"
\version "1.7.18"
% I think this one could be removed or regression'd.
-
+\header{texidoc="REGRESSION or DELETE " }
% a few 32nds shouldn't stretch spacing enormously.
\score {
\notes { \time 3/4
\version "1.7.18"
% candidate for remove or regression.
\header {
-
texidoc = "Check whether all @code{duration} properties can
be printed. This once helped track down an obscure memory corruption
-bug. "
+bug. MOVE TO REGRESSION? (probably not DELETE) "
}
a'1
}
\paper { linewidth = 70 * \staffspace
- raggedright = ##t }
+% raggedright = ##t
+ }
}
%% new-chords-done %%
\version "1.7.18"
-% renamed from broken-thread-line.ly to follow-break.ly -gp
-% possible merge with follow-thread, or regression, or delete. -gp
+% MERGED: stuff from follow-break.ly to follow-thread.ly. DELETE NOW
+
\header{
- texidoc = "@cindex followVoice Break
-followVoice: connect note heads with line when thread switches staff.
-" }
-\score{
- \context PianoStaff <
- \context Staff=one \notes\relative c''{
- \context Thread
- a1 \break
- \translator Staff=two
- a,
+% texidoc = "@cindex followVoice Break
+%followVoice: connect note heads with line when thread switches staff. " }
+texidoc = "MERGED with follow-thread. DELETE."}
+\score{
+ \context PianoStaff <
+ \context Staff=one \notes\relative c''{
+ \context Thread {
+ a1 \break
+ \translator Staff=two
+ a,
+ }
}
\context Staff=two { \clef bass \skip 1*2 }
>
\version "1.7.18"
+% MERGED: stuff from follow-break.ly to follow-thread.ly
% followVoice: connect note heads with line when thread switches staff
\header{ texidoc="@cindex followVoice Thread
property @code{followVoice}. " }
-fragment = \notes {
- \context PianoStaff <
- \property PianoStaff.followVoice = ##t
- \property Voice.VoiceFollower \set #'type = #'dashed-line
- \context Staff \context Voice {
- c'1
- \translator Staff=two
- b2 a
- }
- \context Staff=two {\clef bass \skip 1*2}
- >
-}
-
-\paper { raggedright = ##t}
-
\score {
- \notes\relative c \fragment
+ \notes\relative c {
+ \context PianoStaff=ps <
+ \property PianoStaff.followVoice = ##t
+ \context Staff=one \context Voice {
+ \property Voice.VoiceFollower \set #'type = #'dashed-line
+ c'1
+ \translator Staff=two
+ b2 a
+% these lines from follow-break.ly:
+ \translator Staff=one
+ a1 \break
+ \translator Staff=two
+ a,
+ }
+ \context Staff=two {\clef bass \skip 1*4}
+ >
+ }
+
\paper { raggedright = ##t }
}
%% new-chords-done %%
% I don't see the point. I'll add this to my next round
% of delete'ing, unless Han notices this comment in the
% changelog and deletes it before I ask. :) -gp
-% possibly useful for regression, though. -gp
-\header { texidoc="@cindex Grace End
-You can put grace notes after a note. " }
+\header {texidoc = "DELETE ME " }
+
+%\header { texidoc="@cindex Grace End
+%You can put grace notes after a note. " }
\score {
\context Voice \notes\relative c {
\notes { c'4
< c'4 \context Thread = tb {
- \property Thread.NoteHead \set #'style = #'mensural
+ \property Thread.NoteHead \set #'style = #'harmonic
g'4
} >
\version "1.7.18"
-% I think we have other examples of partcombine. Candidate for delete. -gp
-\header { texidoc = "" }
+% We have other examples of partcombine. Candidate for delete. -gp
+\header { texidoc = "DELETE ME" }
\score{
\context Staff <
\version "1.7.18"
% candidate for regression. -gp
-\header { texidoc = "" }
+\header { texidoc = "REGRESSION or DELETE " }
%{
this combines instrument names and multimeasure rests (there was an
\version "1.7.18"
% candidate for regression -gp
-\header { texidoc = "" }
+\header { texidoc = "REGRESSION or DELETE " }
\score { \notes
\relative cis' {
\version "1.7.18"
% candidate for regression. -gp
-\header { texidoc = "" }
+\header { texidoc = "REGRESSION or DELETE " }
\score{
\notes\relative c'{
a8-[ b'' a,, b'']
\version "1.7.18"
% candidate for regression? -gp
-\header { texidoc = ""}
+\header { texidoc = "REGRESSION or DELETE "}
\score{
\notes\relative c'{
\property Voice.Beam \override #'auto-knee-gap = ##f
\version "1.7.18"
-\header {
-texidoc="
-Draw abritrary lines. This brings LilyPond on par with Mup.
-"
-}
+\header { texidoc="@cindex Lines
+Draw abritrary lines. This brings LilyPond on par with Mup. " }
\score {
\notes\relative c {
\version "1.7.18"
-
-
+% candidate for regression. -gp
%{
Test ly2dvi features.
%}
opus = "opus"
piece = "piece"
poet = "poet"
-texidoc = "This file tests ly2dvi titling. It should be processed with ly2dvi."
+texidoc = "This file tests ly2dvi titling. It should be processed with ly2dvi.
+REGRESSION? (probably not DELETE) "
%
% todo: check whether title.ly does the same. --hwn
\version "1.7.18"
+% regression -gp
+\header { texidoc= "DELETE or REGRESSION. "}
\score{
<
\context Staff \notes { c (c-) (c-) c }
\version "1.7.18"
+% regression -gp
+\header {texidoc="DELETE or REGRESSION. "}
\score{
<
\context Staff \notes { c' (c'-) (c'-) c' }
\version "1.7.18"
+% delete? I don't think it demonstrates much. -gp
+% the only unusual thing here is \melisma
\header{
filename = "twinkle-pop.ly"
-texidoc = "twinkle twinkle in pop-song-settings"
+%texidoc = "twinkle twinkle in pop-song-settings"
+texidoc = "DELETE (unless \melisma is really special. In that case, rename file.) "
}
\version "1.7.18"
-
-
+% looks like another lyric test. regression. -gp
+\header { texidoc="DELETE or REGRESSION. "}
somewhatLong = \lyrics{
\property Lyrics . LyricText \set #'font-style = #'roman
AaaaaaA2